A tool to evaluate the impact of lived experience involvement in research: the Brain and Genomics Hub Impact Log protocol.

Background Despite widespread recognition of the value of lived experience involvement (LEI) in healthcare research and increased LE involvement activity, we lack established implementation methods and instruments for reporting and evaluating impact. We present a protocol for an innovative LE-led Impact Log tool and LEI framework, which may help to address some fundamental barriers to LEI. The Impact Log will be implemented within a five-year multidisciplinary transdiagnostic research project on severe mental illness and is also designed for wider adaptation and use. We include a short literature review on LEI impact, to provide in-depth background. Methods The Impact Log framework is designed to integrate inclusive impactful LEI throughout all research stages, and to use a short accessible form to record and evaluate impact across three domains: design and delivery; interpersonal and environmental aspects; systems and processes. Impact Log design and implementation is led by LE study leads and specialist LE advisory panel, with combined research experience and LE, fully integrated within the wider research team. All Hub research participants will be offered accessible opportunities for remunerated lived experience input, and there will be outreach to ensure diverse representation, aided by the Hub’s charity partners. Data collection and analysis will be LE led and will include iterative analysis to inform continuing development. Diverse formal and informal dissemination throughout the project will maximise wider stakeholder engagement. Conclusion The potential value of this research is to implement a novel tool and framework for facilitating, recording and evaluating LEI in complex mental health research, which can be adapted for wider use. Strengths in design are LE leadership and cross-cutting LE research integration, incorporation of multiple domains, and a focus on facilitating diversity and inclusion within LEI. Potential limitations for this project and wider adaptation may include limited resources, risk of bias and health challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.27426.1
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A tool to evaluate the impact of lived experience involvement in research: the Brain and Genomics Hub Impact Log protocol.

Jérémy Hall, Lavenda Geshica, Sophie E. Legge, Neil Andrew Harrison et al.
Wellcome Open Research
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

A tool to evaluate the impact of lived experience involvement in research: the Brain and Genomics Hub Impact Log protocol.

Jérémy Hall, Lavenda Geshica, Sophie E. Legge, Neil Andrew Harrison, Thomas Kabir, Ann Mary John, Jaycee Kennett, Emily Vicary, Tania Gergel, Talen Wright, Catherine Bresner, Oli Delgaram-Nejad, Georgia Dash, James Heard, James T.R. Walters, Carina Edwards, Ian Jones, Hashwin V.S. Ganesh, Chloe L. Harrison
article en

Abstract

Background Despite widespread recognition of the value of lived experience involvement (LEI) in healthcare research and increased LE involvement activity, we lack established implementation methods and instruments for reporting and evaluating impact. We present a protocol for an innovative LE-led Impact Log tool and LEI framework, which may help to address some fundamental barriers to LEI. The Impact Log will be implemented within a five-year multidisciplinary transdiagnostic research project on severe mental illness and is also designed for wider adaptation and use. We include a short literature review on LEI impact, to provide in-depth background. Methods The Impact Log framework is designed to integrate inclusive impactful LEI throughout all research stages, and to use a short accessible form to record and evaluate impact across three domains: design and delivery; interpersonal and environmental aspects; systems and processes. Impact Log design and implementation is led by LE study leads and specialist LE advisory panel, with combined research experience and LE, fully integrated within the wider research team. All Hub research participants will be offered accessible opportunities for remunerated lived experience input, and there will be outreach to ensure diverse representation, aided by the Hub’s charity partners. Data collection and analysis will be LE led and will include iterative analysis to inform continuing development. Diverse formal and informal dissemination throughout the project will maximise wider stakeholder engagement. Conclusion The potential value of this research is to implement a novel tool and framework for facilitating, recording and evaluating LEI in complex mental health research, which can be adapted for wider use. Strengths in design are LE leadership and cross-cutting LE research integration, incorporation of multiple domains, and a focus on facilitating diversity and inclusion within LEI. Potential limitations for this project and wider adaptation may include limited resources, risk of bias and health challenges.

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 11
University of Ottawa (CA), Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Swansea University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Colwyn Bay Community Hospital (GB), ID Genomics (United States) (US), KES International (GB), UK Dementia Research Institute (GB), National Suicide Research Foundation (IE), Ottawa Public Health (CA), The London College (GB), Science Oxford (GB), Business in the Community (GB), University College London (GB), University of Glasgow (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.