The geography of opposition to motorways: A spatial analysis of the vote on motorway expansions in Switzerland

In November 2024, 52.7% of Swiss citizens rejected government plans to extend six stretches of motorway, an outcome unexpected by most observers. This paper addresses the geography of opposition to motorway capacity expansion projects in relation to the 2126 Swiss municipalities. It provides a spatial analysis of a national vote that is unique from an international perspective and reflects the growing debates on major transport infrastructure. The ‘no’ vote was markedly higher in core cities, while the outcome was more balanced in other types of municipalities. It was also more prevalent in the French-speaking region. This result is in line with a classic left–right political divide that usually structures federal votes, as shown by an analysis of the previous 380 votes. Residual analysis reveals that municipalities close to the planned expansions generally voted ‘no’ but were more in favour than expected – although differences exist according to the spatial and mobility context. Conversely, rural municipalities, traditionally favourable to motorized traffic, were generally less supportive, perhaps due to a lack of expected benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport Geography
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2026.104812
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The geography of opposition to motorways: A spatial analysis of the vote on motorway expansions in Switzerland

Romain Loup, François Bavaud, Patrick Rérat, Suzy Blondin
Journal of Transport Geography
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

The geography of opposition to motorways: A spatial analysis of the vote on motorway expansions in Switzerland

Romain Loup, François Bavaud, Patrick Rérat, Suzy Blondin
article en

Abstract

In November 2024, 52.7% of Swiss citizens rejected government plans to extend six stretches of motorway, an outcome unexpected by most observers. This paper addresses the geography of opposition to motorway capacity expansion projects in relation to the 2126 Swiss municipalities. It provides a spatial analysis of a national vote that is unique from an international perspective and reflects the growing debates on major transport infrastructure. The ‘no’ vote was markedly higher in core cities, while the outcome was more balanced in other types of municipalities. It was also more prevalent in the French-speaking region. This result is in line with a classic left–right political divide that usually structures federal votes, as shown by an analysis of the previous 380 votes. Residual analysis reveals that municipalities close to the planned expansions generally voted ‘no’ but were more in favour than expected – although differences exist according to the spatial and mobility context. Conversely, rural municipalities, traditionally favourable to motorized traffic, were generally less supportive, perhaps due to a lack of expected benefits.

Journal of Transport GeographyVol. 137
University of Lausanne (CH)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The geography of opposition to motorways: A spatial analysis of the vote on motorway expansions in Switzerland — Romain Loup, François Bavaud, et al. · Journal of Transport Geography (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS