Mapping the research, policy, and clinical management landscape of post-tuberculosis lung disease: A scoping review

Tuberculosis (TB) can result in debilitating long-term health consequences, most notably post-tuberculosis lung disease (PTLD). However, these conditions remain insufficiently integrated into global policy and routine care, contributing to fragmented care for millions of TB survivors. This scoping review maps the current landscape to identify critical gaps and support the harmonisation of research, policy, and practice. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed research and global guidance documents published between June 2017 and May 2025. The search for peer-reviewed research focused specifically on PTLD management, whereas the search for guidance documents used broader terms for post-tuberculosis (post-TB) sequelae to assess how PTLD is conceptualised within the wider policy context. Data on recognition, management recommendations, and classification were systematically extracted and thematically synthesised. We included 28 documents: 14 research publications and 14 global guidance documents. The research literature offered detailed management content, including diagnostic assessment, pulmonary rehabilitation and chronic care approaches, acute-on-chronic complication management, and follow-up schedules. In contrast, only 8 of 14 guidance documents provided management recommendations relevant to PTLD. Recurring guidance recommendations included structured post-TB respiratory assessment, multidisciplinary care incorporating rehabilitation and psychosocial support, and clinical, radiological, and functional follow-up, whereas acute-on-chronic management was addressed far less consistently. Overall, we found a translation gap between evidence generation in research and its operationalisation in global guidance. Despite growing awareness and some recent policy progress, the global response to PTLD remains hampered by inconsistent and incompletely operationalised guidance, as well as the absence of standardised definitions, classification, and programmatic indicators. Accelerating the translation of research into integrated policy and practice is needed to improve the long-term health and quality of life of TB survivors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0007150
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the research, policy, and clinical management landscape of post-tuberculosis lung disease: A scoping review

Salome Charalambous, Yochanan Hoppenstein, Olena Ivanova
PLOS Global Public Health
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
article

Mapping the research, policy, and clinical management landscape of post-tuberculosis lung disease: A scoping review

Salome Charalambous, Yochanan Hoppenstein, Olena Ivanova
article en

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) can result in debilitating long-term health consequences, most notably post-tuberculosis lung disease (PTLD). However, these conditions remain insufficiently integrated into global policy and routine care, contributing to fragmented care for millions of TB survivors. This scoping review maps the current landscape to identify critical gaps and support the harmonisation of research, policy, and practice. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed research and global guidance documents published between June 2017 and May 2025. The search for peer-reviewed research focused specifically on PTLD management, whereas the search for guidance documents used broader terms for post-tuberculosis (post-TB) sequelae to assess how PTLD is conceptualised within the wider policy context. Data on recognition, management recommendations, and classification were systematically extracted and thematically synthesised. We included 28 documents: 14 research publications and 14 global guidance documents. The research literature offered detailed management content, including diagnostic assessment, pulmonary rehabilitation and chronic care approaches, acute-on-chronic complication management, and follow-up schedules. In contrast, only 8 of 14 guidance documents provided management recommendations relevant to PTLD. Recurring guidance recommendations included structured post-TB respiratory assessment, multidisciplinary care incorporating rehabilitation and psychosocial support, and clinical, radiological, and functional follow-up, whereas acute-on-chronic management was addressed far less consistently. Overall, we found a translation gap between evidence generation in research and its operationalisation in global guidance. Despite growing awareness and some recent policy progress, the global response to PTLD remains hampered by inconsistent and incompletely operationalised guidance, as well as the absence of standardised definitions, classification, and programmatic indicators. Accelerating the translation of research into integrated policy and practice is needed to improve the long-term health and quality of life of TB survivors.

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(8)
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Aurum Institute (ZA), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
South African Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.