‘I've been here before, but never looked at the ceiling’: Narratives of medical trainees who took illness‐based leaves

INTRODUCTION: Medical training is commonly imagined as a linear, uninterrupted progression, yet many trainees experience illness that necessitates a leave of absence (LOA). Illness-based leaves may be especially fraught given stigma, opaque processes and training cultures that prioritise endurance. Little is known about how trainees experience illness and illness-based leaves. METHODS: We conducted a narrative inquiry using Riessman's narrative analysis framework. Canadian physicians who had taken an illness-based LOA during medical school or residency were recruited nationwide. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were completed between December 2022 and July 2023, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was inductive and iterative, examining narrative content and structure to understand participants' meaning-making and shifting positioning within their stories. Rigour was supported through reflexive practice, collaborative team analysis and Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ)-informed reporting. RESULTS: Seven participants shared the stories of their illness-based leaves because of diverse conditions (including rheumatologic disease, malignancy, mental illness, traumatic brain injury and a movement disorder). Narratives followed common threads: (1) identity disruption, as illness fractured self-concepts built on competence and grit and shifted trainee identities from clinician to patient; (2) loss of narrative control with shifting protagonists, as administrative and service demands shaped decisions and timelines, often intensifying vulnerability; (3) isolation and perceived illegitimacy, compounded by cohort separation, stigma and the need to justify both 'visible' and 'invisible' illness; (4) misalignment between individual needs and structural expectations, marked by unclear processes, limited accommodations, and reliance on informal workarounds or external advocacy; and (5) meaning-making and purpose-greater humanism and advocacy-coexisting with residual disillusionment when systems remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Illness-based leaves in medical training are narrated as profound identity disruptions, shaped by structural rigidity and cultural expectations of uninterrupted productivity. Training programmes should develop transparent, compassionate leave and accommodation processes, normalise vulnerability within professional identity formation and incorporate trainees' voices into policy to better support learners who become ill. This will retain the perspectives they bring to patient care and teaching.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Education
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70302
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘I've been here before, but never looked at the ceiling’: Narratives of medical trainees who took illness‐based leaves

Martina Kelly, Pim W. Teunissen, Taryn Taylor, Daniela Keren et al.
Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

‘I've been here before, but never looked at the ceiling’: Narratives of medical trainees who took illness‐based leaves

Martina Kelly, Pim W. Teunissen, Taryn Taylor, Daniela Keren, Lorelei Lingard
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Medical training is commonly imagined as a linear, uninterrupted progression, yet many trainees experience illness that necessitates a leave of absence (LOA). Illness-based leaves may be especially fraught given stigma, opaque processes and training cultures that prioritise endurance. Little is known about how trainees experience illness and illness-based leaves. METHODS: We conducted a narrative inquiry using Riessman's narrative analysis framework. Canadian physicians who had taken an illness-based LOA during medical school or residency were recruited nationwide. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were completed between December 2022 and July 2023, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Analysis was inductive and iterative, examining narrative content and structure to understand participants' meaning-making and shifting positioning within their stories. Rigour was supported through reflexive practice, collaborative team analysis and Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ)-informed reporting. RESULTS: Seven participants shared the stories of their illness-based leaves because of diverse conditions (including rheumatologic disease, malignancy, mental illness, traumatic brain injury and a movement disorder). Narratives followed common threads: (1) identity disruption, as illness fractured self-concepts built on competence and grit and shifted trainee identities from clinician to patient; (2) loss of narrative control with shifting protagonists, as administrative and service demands shaped decisions and timelines, often intensifying vulnerability; (3) isolation and perceived illegitimacy, compounded by cohort separation, stigma and the need to justify both 'visible' and 'invisible' illness; (4) misalignment between individual needs and structural expectations, marked by unclear processes, limited accommodations, and reliance on informal workarounds or external advocacy; and (5) meaning-making and purpose-greater humanism and advocacy-coexisting with residual disillusionment when systems remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Illness-based leaves in medical training are narrated as profound identity disruptions, shaped by structural rigidity and cultural expectations of uninterrupted productivity. Training programmes should develop transparent, compassionate leave and accommodation processes, normalise vulnerability within professional identity formation and incorporate trainees' voices into policy to better support learners who become ill. This will retain the perspectives they bring to patient care and teaching.

Medical Education
Western University (CA), Mount Sinai Hospital (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Maastricht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.