Adapting to generative AI in creative work: a technological frames perspective on creative advertising

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming creative work, yet creatives do not respond uniformly. To explain this variation, we draw on the concept of technological frames, three years of netnographic research in online advertising communities, and interviews with advertising creatives. Our analysis identifies competing interpretations of GenAI—regarding its level of agency in the creative process, its impact on jobs, and its role in shifting how value is created in outputs—that converge in distinct narratives about its implications for creative work. These narratives, in turn, drive distinct adaptive responses among creatives: AI skilling, reskilling, and deep skilling—the latter involving deliberate cultivation of human capabilities that GenAI cannot readily replicate. The findings inform both research on GenAI in creative work and managers navigating its adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116483
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adapting to generative AI in creative work: a technological frames perspective on creative advertising

Maja Golf Papez, Georg von Richthofen, Sonja Köhne
Journal of Business Research
AI in Service Interactions
article

Adapting to generative AI in creative work: a technological frames perspective on creative advertising

Maja Golf Papez, Georg von Richthofen, Sonja Köhne
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming creative work, yet creatives do not respond uniformly. To explain this variation, we draw on the concept of technological frames, three years of netnographic research in online advertising communities, and interviews with advertising creatives. Our analysis identifies competing interpretations of GenAI—regarding its level of agency in the creative process, its impact on jobs, and its role in shifting how value is created in outputs—that converge in distinct narratives about its implications for creative work. These narratives, in turn, drive distinct adaptive responses among creatives: AI skilling, reskilling, and deep skilling—the latter involving deliberate cultivation of human capabilities that GenAI cannot readily replicate. The findings inform both research on GenAI in creative work and managers navigating its adoption.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 218
University of Sussex (GB), Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (DE)
Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.