Quantity or quality: how common institutional investors with green experience shape corporate green innovation

Corporate green innovation is constrained not only by financial constraints but also by deficiencies in green governance capabilities. Exploiting the initial entry of common institutional investors with green experience as a quasi-natural experiment, this study employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model to examine its effect on corporate green innovation using data from Chinese A-share listed firms during 2010–2023. The results show that common institutional investors with green experience significantly enhance both the quantity and the quality of corporate green innovation. These findings remain robust after a series of endogeneity and robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that such investors promote green innovation through two main channels: mitigating managerial myopia and reducing green agency costs. Heterogeneity analyses further reveal that the positive effect is more pronounced in regions with weaker environmental regulation and in firms whose executives exhibit stronger green awareness. Additional analyses indicate that common institutional investors with green experience also significantly enhance firms’ ESG performance, while command-and-control environmental regulation further strengthens these effects. This study contributes novel theoretical insights and empirical evidence on how green finance facilitates corporate green transformation through specialised investor governance channels, offering important policy implications for emerging economies seeking to promote green innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2026.2723501
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantity or quality: how common institutional investors with green experience shape corporate green innovation

Libin Zhao, Xiangfei Fu, Lianghua Chen, Fangfang Zhou
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Quantity or quality: how common institutional investors with green experience shape corporate green innovation

Libin Zhao, Xiangfei Fu, Lianghua Chen, Fangfang Zhou
article en

Abstract

Corporate green innovation is constrained not only by financial constraints but also by deficiencies in green governance capabilities. Exploiting the initial entry of common institutional investors with green experience as a quasi-natural experiment, this study employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model to examine its effect on corporate green innovation using data from Chinese A-share listed firms during 2010–2023. The results show that common institutional investors with green experience significantly enhance both the quantity and the quality of corporate green innovation. These findings remain robust after a series of endogeneity and robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that such investors promote green innovation through two main channels: mitigating managerial myopia and reducing green agency costs. Heterogeneity analyses further reveal that the positive effect is more pronounced in regions with weaker environmental regulation and in firms whose executives exhibit stronger green awareness. Additional analyses indicate that common institutional investors with green experience also significantly enhance firms’ ESG performance, while command-and-control environmental regulation further strengthens these effects. This study contributes novel theoretical insights and empirical evidence on how green finance facilitates corporate green transformation through specialised investor governance channels, offering important policy implications for emerging economies seeking to promote green innovation.

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
Nanjing Audit University (CN), Wuhan Textile University (CN)
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.