Appreciation From Supervisors, Colleagues, and Clients: Its Differential Impact on the Qualitative Job Insecurity–Organizational Loyalty Link

Abstract: Organizational loyalty is associated with positive behaviors in organizations. Therefore, organizations need to avoid negative situations that may make maintaining or increasing employee loyalty difficult. One negative situation that can harm organizational loyalty is the perception that valued job characteristics are at stake. This phenomenon, which is called qualitative job insecurity, is associated with negative outcomes. On the basis of the job demands–resources theory, we examined the negative consequences of qualitative job insecurity on organizational loyalty operationalized by organizational trust, affective commitment, and turnover intentions. In addition, we explored whether appreciation at the workplace moderates the relationship between qualitative job insecurity and organizational loyalty. We conducted an online study with two waves of data collection ( N = 115 participants) and a time lag of 6 weeks. Our results revealed that qualitative job insecurity has a negative impact on organizational loyalty and that appreciation moderates this relationship. Moreover, the moderating role of appreciation depends on its source (whether it is from supervisors, colleagues, or clients). This paper discusses the implications of the different sources of appreciation in managing the risk of worsening job conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000485
Primary Topic
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Appreciation From Supervisors, Colleagues, and Clients: Its Differential Impact on the Qualitative Job Insecurity–Organizational Loyalty Link

Patricia Garrido‐Vásquez, Mauricio E. Garrido Vásquez, Maria U. Kottwitz, Kathleen Otto et al.
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
article

Appreciation From Supervisors, Colleagues, and Clients: Its Differential Impact on the Qualitative Job Insecurity–Organizational Loyalty Link

Patricia Garrido‐Vásquez, Mauricio E. Garrido Vásquez, Maria U. Kottwitz, Kathleen Otto, Kristin Weiss, Ernesto Garrido-Cerda
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Organizational loyalty is associated with positive behaviors in organizations. Therefore, organizations need to avoid negative situations that may make maintaining or increasing employee loyalty difficult. One negative situation that can harm organizational loyalty is the perception that valued job characteristics are at stake. This phenomenon, which is called qualitative job insecurity, is associated with negative outcomes. On the basis of the job demands–resources theory, we examined the negative consequences of qualitative job insecurity on organizational loyalty operationalized by organizational trust, affective commitment, and turnover intentions. In addition, we explored whether appreciation at the workplace moderates the relationship between qualitative job insecurity and organizational loyalty. We conducted an online study with two waves of data collection ( N = 115 participants) and a time lag of 6 weeks. Our results revealed that qualitative job insecurity has a negative impact on organizational loyalty and that appreciation moderates this relationship. Moreover, the moderating role of appreciation depends on its source (whether it is from supervisors, colleagues, or clients). This paper discusses the implications of the different sources of appreciation in managing the risk of worsening job conditions.

Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O
University of Bern (CH), Philipps University of Marburg (DE), University of Concepción (CL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.