Political outgroups as monoliths: evidence of perceived political outgroup homogeneity

The outgroup homogeneity effect describes a tendency for people to perceive outgroup members as more similar to one another than ingroup members. This pattern has been found for various attributes (e.g., faces, preferences, and personality) and with respect to various outgroup types (e.g., gender, nationality, minimal groups). Four pre-registered studies (total N = 3243) using three distinct measures of perceived homogeneity replicated the basic effect: American Democrats and Republicans consistently perceived their political outgroup to have more homogenous political views than their ingroup. Extending beyond previous findings, this effect was mediated by the belief that their political outgroup has less informed views than their ingroup, and having less emotional vigilance toward ingroup dissent. As well, participants who perceived more threat perceived higher outgroup homogeneity. Participants who perceived their outgroups as more homogenous also perceived them as having more intention and being more capable of taking coordinated action to further the group’s interests, indicative of higher threat. These findings suggest that perceived threat may function as a cause or consequence of political outgroup homogeneity, leading to further political animosity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Collections
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0455601
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political outgroups as monoliths: evidence of perceived political outgroup homogeneity

Khai Qing Chua
Open Collections
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Political outgroups as monoliths: evidence of perceived political outgroup homogeneity

Khai Qing Chua
article en

Abstract

The outgroup homogeneity effect describes a tendency for people to perceive outgroup members as more similar to one another than ingroup members. This pattern has been found for various attributes (e.g., faces, preferences, and personality) and with respect to various outgroup types (e.g., gender, nationality, minimal groups). Four pre-registered studies (total N = 3243) using three distinct measures of perceived homogeneity replicated the basic effect: American Democrats and Republicans consistently perceived their political outgroup to have more homogenous political views than their ingroup. Extending beyond previous findings, this effect was mediated by the belief that their political outgroup has less informed views than their ingroup, and having less emotional vigilance toward ingroup dissent. As well, participants who perceived more threat perceived higher outgroup homogeneity. Participants who perceived their outgroups as more homogenous also perceived them as having more intention and being more capable of taking coordinated action to further the group’s interests, indicative of higher threat. These findings suggest that perceived threat may function as a cause or consequence of political outgroup homogeneity, leading to further political animosity.

Open Collections
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Political outgroups as monoliths: evidence of perceived political outgroup homogeneity — Khai Qing Chua · Open Collections (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS