Are perceptions of inter-party conflict-gendered and do they shape political ambition among citizens and politicians?

Political conflict is endemic in politics. While women politicians are known to engage in more consensual practices than men, it remains unclear whether these differences arise from women politicians having distinct preferences regarding inter-party conflicts. Furthermore, our understanding of how women citizens value inter-party conflict is limited, as is our understanding of whether these evaluations contribute to their lower political ambition. To address these questions, we conducted a parallel survey among 744 Members of Parliament and 14,461 citizens across 10 countries. While our findings reveal that women citizens are generally less supportive of inter-party conflict, women politicians do not share this aversion. In addition, our results suggest that women citizens are less politically ambitious, but this is not explained by their preference for consensus. Given that women are more likely to stand if encouraged, our results suggest that parties are less likely to recruit conflict-averse women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957261477623
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are perceptions of inter-party conflict-gendered and do they shape political ambition among citizens and politicians?

Toni G.L.A. van der Meer, Emma van der Goot, Ondřej Císař, Pirmin Bundi et al.
Politics
Gender Politics and Representation
article

Are perceptions of inter-party conflict-gendered and do they shape political ambition among citizens and politicians?

Toni G.L.A. van der Meer, Emma van der Goot, Ondřej Císař, Pirmin Bundi, Chris Butler
article en

Abstract

Political conflict is endemic in politics. While women politicians are known to engage in more consensual practices than men, it remains unclear whether these differences arise from women politicians having distinct preferences regarding inter-party conflicts. Furthermore, our understanding of how women citizens value inter-party conflict is limited, as is our understanding of whether these evaluations contribute to their lower political ambition. To address these questions, we conducted a parallel survey among 744 Members of Parliament and 14,461 citizens across 10 countries. While our findings reveal that women citizens are generally less supportive of inter-party conflict, women politicians do not share this aversion. In addition, our results suggest that women citizens are less politically ambitious, but this is not explained by their preference for consensus. Given that women are more likely to stand if encouraged, our results suggest that parties are less likely to recruit conflict-averse women.

Politics
University of Antwerp (BE), Charles University (CZ), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Lausanne (CH)
European Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are perceptions of inter-party conflict-gendered and do they shape political ambition among citizens and politicians? — Toni G.L.A. van der Meer, Emma van der Goot, et al. · Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS