Workflow evaluation of a commercial deep learning-based image analysis tool for the quantification of angiogenesis in vivo

Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in tumor development as well as in wound healing and integration of biomaterials. However, quantification of complex vascular networks across different in vivo models is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to human error. Deep learning-based analysis (DLBA) appears to be a more efficient and reproducible method for vascular quantification . Yet, studies directly comparing its performance with human assessment remain limited. IKOSA CAM is a commercially available tool built for analysis of vascular networks. Here we evaluated IKOSA CAM against manual vessel tracing across three different angiogenesis models. Images obtained from three different in vivo angiogenesis models, the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay, the rodent retina, and the dorsal skinfold chamber (DSC), were analyzed. The vascular network was analyzed using both manual tracing and the commercial deep learning-based image analysis tool IKOSA CAM. In addition, tracing results were reevaluated by human raters and the total workflow duration was assessed. Deep learning-based image analysis proved to be a time-efficient method for tracing and quantifying vascular networks. The level of agreement with manual human tracing varied among image types. The highest agreement between the two methods was observed for the CAM assay. The greatest differences occurred in the tracing of DSC branching points, as indicated by a downward trend in the Bland-Altman plots. Repeated analyses with the DLBA produced identical results for all tested angiogenesis models, confirming excellent reproducibility. Standardized vascular quantification remains a major challenge in experimental angiogenesis research. In this workflow validation study, the evaluated DLBA provided reproducible and time-efficient vessel quantification, particularly for the CAM assay, while showing limitations in the analysis of retinal and DSC images. Overall, DLBA represents a promising approach for standardized vascular analysis and may facilitate reproducible, high-throughput image quantification. Nevertheless, further validation using larger and more heterogeneous datasets is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-68133-1
Primary Topic
Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Workflow evaluation of a commercial deep learning-based image analysis tool for the quantification of angiogenesis in vivo

Jonas Eckrich, Christoph Raphael Buhr, Benjamin Philipp Ernst, Nadine Wiesmann et al.
Scientific Reports
Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
article

Workflow evaluation of a commercial deep learning-based image analysis tool for the quantification of angiogenesis in vivo

Jonas Eckrich, Christoph Raphael Buhr, Benjamin Philipp Ernst, Nadine Wiesmann, Juergen Brieger, Anita Kloss‐Brandstätter, Christoph Matthias, Alexander Philippe Maas, Philipp Herrmann
article en

Abstract

Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in tumor development as well as in wound healing and integration of biomaterials. However, quantification of complex vascular networks across different in vivo models is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to human error. Deep learning-based analysis (DLBA) appears to be a more efficient and reproducible method for vascular quantification . Yet, studies directly comparing its performance with human assessment remain limited. IKOSA CAM is a commercially available tool built for analysis of vascular networks. Here we evaluated IKOSA CAM against manual vessel tracing across three different angiogenesis models. Images obtained from three different in vivo angiogenesis models, the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay, the rodent retina, and the dorsal skinfold chamber (DSC), were analyzed. The vascular network was analyzed using both manual tracing and the commercial deep learning-based image analysis tool IKOSA CAM. In addition, tracing results were reevaluated by human raters and the total workflow duration was assessed. Deep learning-based image analysis proved to be a time-efficient method for tracing and quantifying vascular networks. The level of agreement with manual human tracing varied among image types. The highest agreement between the two methods was observed for the CAM assay. The greatest differences occurred in the tracing of DSC branching points, as indicated by a downward trend in the Bland-Altman plots. Repeated analyses with the DLBA produced identical results for all tested angiogenesis models, confirming excellent reproducibility. Standardized vascular quantification remains a major challenge in experimental angiogenesis research. In this workflow validation study, the evaluated DLBA provided reproducible and time-efficient vessel quantification, particularly for the CAM assay, while showing limitations in the analysis of retinal and DSC images. Overall, DLBA represents a promising approach for standardized vascular analysis and may facilitate reproducible, high-throughput image quantification. Nevertheless, further validation using larger and more heterogeneous datasets is warranted.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Bonn (DE), University of Applied Sciences Mainz (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Hospital Bonn (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt (DE), FH Kärnten (AT), University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.