Associations of Multifaceted Subjective Age with Health and Well-Being in Japan

Abstract: Despite the growing attention on the significant relationship between subjective age (SA) and quality of life, it is still under debate how to conceptualize and measure SA, how to understand it within theoretical frameworks of lifespan development, and how SA relates to health and well-being, particularly in non-Western populations. This study took a multifaceted approach to explore this issue. We assessed multiple SA measures (felt age, physical age, ideal age, appearance age, interest age, and various composite measures) in a non-Western sample comprising 2,896 Japanese adults aged 20–89 to compare their associations with sociodemographic, health and well-being variables. Correlation and hierarchical regression analyses showed that better health and greater well-being were particularly closely associated with feeling physically younger. Ideal age showed opposite trends to the other single SA measures. Furthermore, ideal age was the only single index that showed a significant association with the Happiness Scale in the regression analysis, such that a stronger wish to be younger was associated with lower happiness. Discrepancy-based composite measures offered additional insight into within-person inconsistency, potentially indicating ambivalent feelings toward aging and intrapersonal incongruencies in one’s SA. This study highlights the importance of adopting a multifaceted perspective on SA to gain a broader understanding of how different SA measures are related to health and well-being in a non-Western cultural context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GeroPsych
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000372
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of Multifaceted Subjective Age with Health and Well-Being in Japan

Susanne Wurm, Hikari Kinjo, Markus Wettstein
GeroPsych
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Associations of Multifaceted Subjective Age with Health and Well-Being in Japan

Susanne Wurm, Hikari Kinjo, Markus Wettstein
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Despite the growing attention on the significant relationship between subjective age (SA) and quality of life, it is still under debate how to conceptualize and measure SA, how to understand it within theoretical frameworks of lifespan development, and how SA relates to health and well-being, particularly in non-Western populations. This study took a multifaceted approach to explore this issue. We assessed multiple SA measures (felt age, physical age, ideal age, appearance age, interest age, and various composite measures) in a non-Western sample comprising 2,896 Japanese adults aged 20–89 to compare their associations with sociodemographic, health and well-being variables. Correlation and hierarchical regression analyses showed that better health and greater well-being were particularly closely associated with feeling physically younger. Ideal age showed opposite trends to the other single SA measures. Furthermore, ideal age was the only single index that showed a significant association with the Happiness Scale in the regression analysis, such that a stronger wish to be younger was associated with lower happiness. Discrepancy-based composite measures offered additional insight into within-person inconsistency, potentially indicating ambivalent feelings toward aging and intrapersonal incongruencies in one’s SA. This study highlights the importance of adopting a multifaceted perspective on SA to gain a broader understanding of how different SA measures are related to health and well-being in a non-Western cultural context.

GeroPsych
Meiji Gakuin University (JP), Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.