Comparative assessment of natural fiber-reinforced polymer PET/PETG composites for sustainable UAV materials

This study presents an innovative evaluation of natural fiber-reinforced PET and PETG composites for UAV wing structures operating under NEOM wind conditions, defined by a mean wind speed of 5.6 m/s and peak gusts of 12 m/s. Aerodynamic analysis demonstrated a stable lift-to-drag ratio of 15.8 across the operating range, while lift increased quadratically from 1.75 N at 3 m/s to 77.95 N at 20 m/s. Thrust demand remained nearly constant between 4.79 and 4.85 N, indicating efficient propulsion stability under variable airflow conditions. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework was developed to rank candidate materials using specific stiffness (40%), specific strength (30%), and carbon footprint (30%). The results established a clear performance hierarchy led by Ramie/PETG, which achieved the highest overall score through exceptional specific stiffness of 35.5 GPa·cm 3 /g and a low carbon footprint of 1.64 kg CO 2 e/kg. Ramie/PET ranked second, delivering the highest tensile strength of 372.6 MPa together with strong specific stiffness of 29.4 GPa·cm 3 /g. The PETG matrix consistently surpassed PET because of its higher modulus (1.95 vs 1.094 GPa), lower density (1.27 vs 1.60 g/cm 3 ), and narrower carbon footprint range. These findings identify Ramie/PETG as the preferred solution for UAV wings requiring maximum flutter resistance, while Ramie/PET is recommended where peak structural strength is the primary design objective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09544100261484322
Primary Topic
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative assessment of natural fiber-reinforced polymer PET/PETG composites for sustainable UAV materials

Abderraouf Gherissi
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
article

Comparative assessment of natural fiber-reinforced polymer PET/PETG composites for sustainable UAV materials

Abderraouf Gherissi
article en

Abstract

This study presents an innovative evaluation of natural fiber-reinforced PET and PETG composites for UAV wing structures operating under NEOM wind conditions, defined by a mean wind speed of 5.6 m/s and peak gusts of 12 m/s. Aerodynamic analysis demonstrated a stable lift-to-drag ratio of 15.8 across the operating range, while lift increased quadratically from 1.75 N at 3 m/s to 77.95 N at 20 m/s. Thrust demand remained nearly constant between 4.79 and 4.85 N, indicating efficient propulsion stability under variable airflow conditions. A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework was developed to rank candidate materials using specific stiffness (40%), specific strength (30%), and carbon footprint (30%). The results established a clear performance hierarchy led by Ramie/PETG, which achieved the highest overall score through exceptional specific stiffness of 35.5 GPa·cm 3 /g and a low carbon footprint of 1.64 kg CO 2 e/kg. Ramie/PET ranked second, delivering the highest tensile strength of 372.6 MPa together with strong specific stiffness of 29.4 GPa·cm 3 /g. The PETG matrix consistently surpassed PET because of its higher modulus (1.95 vs 1.094 GPa), lower density (1.27 vs 1.60 g/cm 3 ), and narrower carbon footprint range. These findings identify Ramie/PETG as the preferred solution for UAV wings requiring maximum flutter resistance, while Ramie/PET is recommended where peak structural strength is the primary design objective.

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering
University of Tabuk (SA)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.