Dissociable effects of schema congruency on item recognition and source memory across levels of expectedness and surprise

{"Prior":[0],"knowledge":[1,230],"can":[2],"enhance":[3,137],"memory":[4,16,99,143],"for":[5,110,160,191,215],"both":[6,24],"schema-congruent":[7],"and":[8,27,75,77,177],"schema-incongruent":[9],"events.":[10,206],"According":[11],"to":[12,128,164],"the":[13,181,184,211,221],"SLIMM":[14],"framework,":[15],"performance":[17],"generally":[18],"follows":[19],"a":[20,61,146],"U-shaped":[21,148,213],"pattern,":[22,149],"with":[23,125],"highly":[25,28],"expected":[26,57,91,111,140,205],"surprising":[29,59,93,161],"events":[30,170],"being":[31],"better":[32],"remembered":[33],"than":[34],"neutral":[35],"ones.":[36],"We":[37,131,166],"tested":[38],"this":[39,152],"prediction":[40],"across":[41],"four":[42],"experiments":[43],"in":[44,81,227],"which":[45,82,201,228],"participants":[46,83,168],"viewed":[47],"scenes":[48],"containing":[49],"congruent":[50],"or":[51,58,92,173,188],"incongruent":[52],"objects,":[53],"rating":[54],"each":[55],"as":[56,90,171],"on":[60,98,197],"four-level":[62],"scale.":[63],"Memory":[64],"was":[65,186],"assessed":[66],"using:":[67],"(1)":[68],"old/new":[69],"item":[70],"recognition":[71,105],"categorized":[72,193],"by":[73,101],"recollection":[74,138],"familiarity,":[76],"(2)":[78],"source":[79,216],"memory,":[80],"reported":[84],"whether":[85],"objects":[86],"had":[87],"been":[88],"rated":[89],"at":[94],"study.":[95],"Schema":[96],"effects":[97],"varied":[100],"test":[102,224],"type.":[103],"Item":[104],"consistently":[106],"showed":[107],"an":[108,158],"advantage":[109,159],"trials":[112,162],"only,":[113],"primarily":[114],"via":[115],"recollection,":[116],"while":[117],"familiarity":[118],"(if":[119],"assumed":[120],"independent":[121],"of":[122,139,204],"recollection)":[123],"increased":[124],"surprise":[126],"level-contrary":[127],"SLIMM's":[129],"predictions.":[130],"hypothesize":[132],"that":[133],"schema-related":[134,198],"retrieval":[135,199,203,223],"strategies":[136],"objects.":[141],"Source":[142],"did":[144],"produce":[145,157,210],"reliable":[147],"even":[150],"though":[151],"particular":[153],"task":[154],"should":[155],"only":[156],"according":[163],"SLIMM.":[165],"suggest":[167],"tagged":[169],"\\"surprising\\"":[172],"\\"expected\\"":[174],"during":[175],"study":[176],"could":[178],"later":[179],"recall":[180],"tag.":[182],"When":[183],"tag":[185],"'weak'":[187],"unavailable-more":[189],"likely":[190],"moderately":[192],"events-participants":[194],"fell":[195],"back":[196],"strategy,":[200],"benefits":[202],"Together,":[207],"these":[208],"mechanisms":[209],"observed":[212],"pattern":[214],"memory.":[217,233],"Our":[218],"findings":[219],"reveal":[220],"complex":[222],"dependent":[225],"manner":[226],"prior":[229],"shapes":[231],"episodic":[232]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory & Cognition
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-026-01930-1
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Dissociable effects of schema congruency on item recognition and source memory across levels of expectedness and surprise

Limor Shtoots, Andrea Greve, Amnon Yacoby, Daniel A. Levy et al.
Memory & Cognition
Memory Processes and Influences
article

Dissociable effects of schema congruency on item recognition and source memory across levels of expectedness and surprise

Limor Shtoots, Andrea Greve, Amnon Yacoby, Daniel A. Levy, Richard N. Henson, Erin Schaverien
article en

Abstract

Prior knowledge can enhance memory for both schema-congruent and schema-incongruent events. According to the SLIMM framework, memory performance generally follows a U-shaped pattern, with both highly expected and highly surprising events being better remembered than neutral ones. We tested this prediction across four experiments in which participants viewed scenes containing congruent or incongruent objects, rating each as expected or surprising on a four-level scale. Memory was assessed using: (1) old/new item recognition categorized by recollection and familiarity, and (2) source memory, in which participants reported whether objects had been rated as expected or surprising at study. Schema effects on memory varied by test type. Item recognition consistently showed an advantage for expected trials only, primarily via recollection, while familiarity (if assumed independent of recollection) increased with surprise level-contrary to SLIMM's predictions. We hypothesize that schema-related retrieval strategies enhance recollection of expected objects. Source memory did produce a reliable U-shaped pattern, even though this particular task should only produce an advantage for surprising trials according to SLIMM. We suggest participants tagged events as "surprising" or "expected" during study and could later recall the tag. When the tag was 'weak' or unavailable-more likely for moderately categorized events-participants fell back on schema-related retrieval strategy, which benefits retrieval of expected events. Together, these mechanisms produce the observed U-shaped pattern for source memory. Our findings reveal the complex retrieval test dependent manner in which prior knowledge shapes episodic memory.

Memory & Cognition
Reichman University (IL), Palo Alto University (US), MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Herzliya Medical Center (IL)
UK Research and Innovation, Medical Research Council, Reichman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.