Institutional theory and vocational education: a discussion

Institutional theories have come to dominate comparisons of vocational education systems. Their emphasis on the agency of social actors outside the educational sphere has proved attractive to researchers seeking to understand the complex social relations in which vocational education is embedded. These questions are discussed here with special regard to historical institutionalism, by two authors with diverging views of the significance and value of these theoretical approaches. For Maurer, institutional theory, and especially historical institutionalism, offers a valuable opportunity to theorise VET research. For Esmond, its emphasis on shared interests and perpetuation of path-dependent models understate how VET has been contested among irreconcilable actors in the past and the possibility of changes that advance social justice in the future. The authors agree that the descriptive nature of these theories, which lack a normative educational dimension or critical perspective, enables important comparisons but necessarily limits their capacity to guide future change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2026.2721612
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional theory and vocational education: a discussion

Markus Maurer, Bill Esmond
Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Institutional theory and vocational education: a discussion

Markus Maurer, Bill Esmond
article en

Abstract

Institutional theories have come to dominate comparisons of vocational education systems. Their emphasis on the agency of social actors outside the educational sphere has proved attractive to researchers seeking to understand the complex social relations in which vocational education is embedded. These questions are discussed here with special regard to historical institutionalism, by two authors with diverging views of the significance and value of these theoretical approaches. For Maurer, institutional theory, and especially historical institutionalism, offers a valuable opportunity to theorise VET research. For Esmond, its emphasis on shared interests and perpetuation of path-dependent models understate how VET has been contested among irreconcilable actors in the past and the possibility of changes that advance social justice in the future. The authors agree that the descriptive nature of these theories, which lack a normative educational dimension or critical perspective, enables important comparisons but necessarily limits their capacity to guide future change.

Journal of Vocational Education and Training
University of Derby (GB), Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH)
University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutional theory and vocational education: a discussion — Markus Maurer, Bill Esmond · Journal of Vocational Education and Training (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS