Genomic instability, postoperative recurrence and therapeutic vulnerabilities in resectable non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is managed largely according to anatomical stage, pathological risk and actionable driver alterations, yet these factors do not fully explain postoperative recurrence.Genomic instability may contribute to recurrence by promoting clonal diversification, intratumoral heterogeneity, occult dissemination, persistence of residual tumor cells, and immune escape.In the present review, chromosomal instability (CIN), copy-number complexity, whole-genome doubling, DNA repair defects, replication stress, and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) were critically evaluated using a three-axis translational framework encompassing biological consequences, potential clinical roles, and strength of evidence.Current evidence suggests that clonal diversity and copy-number complexity have the clearest near-term prognostic rationale.By contrast, CIN and whole-genome doubling are supported more strongly by evolutionary and mechanistic rather than prospective clinical evidence.Defects in DNA repair, replication stress, and ecDNA represent potential therapeutic vulnerabilities, but their clinical relevance remains to be established.To date, no treatment-predictive biomarkers based on genomic instability have been identified for resectable NSCLC.Direct clinical evidence linking any specific genomic instability feature to the presence or longitudinal dynamics of postoperative molecular residual disease (MRD) remains limited.Postoperative circulating tumor DNA-defined MRD provides prognostic information more directly related to residual disease but remains assay-dependent and should not be considered a genomic-instability phenotype.Therefore, features of genomic instability should remain investigational and should not replace established clinical, pathological, or molecular decision-making.Their near-term value lies in refining biological risk models and generating testable hypotheses for biomarker-defined perioperative trials.Contents 1. Introduction 2. Forms and sources of genomic instability in NSCLC 3. Clonal evolution and tumor heterogeneity 4. Postoperative recurrence biology 5. Genomic instability and MRD 6.I m mune m icro envi ron ment a nd p er iop erat ive immunotherapy 7. Candidate therapeutic vulnerabilities of unstable genomes 8. Translational prioritization and perioperative interpretation 9. Challenges and future directions 10.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Reports
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2026.9188
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic instability, postoperative recurrence and therapeutic vulnerabilities in resectable non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Linlin Wang, Qiang Liu, Yong Feng
Oncology Reports
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Genomic instability, postoperative recurrence and therapeutic vulnerabilities in resectable non‑small cell lung cancer (Review)

Linlin Wang, Qiang Liu, Yong Feng
article en

Abstract

Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is managed largely according to anatomical stage, pathological risk and actionable driver alterations, yet these factors do not fully explain postoperative recurrence.Genomic instability may contribute to recurrence by promoting clonal diversification, intratumoral heterogeneity, occult dissemination, persistence of residual tumor cells, and immune escape.In the present review, chromosomal instability (CIN), copy-number complexity, whole-genome doubling, DNA repair defects, replication stress, and extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) were critically evaluated using a three-axis translational framework encompassing biological consequences, potential clinical roles, and strength of evidence.Current evidence suggests that clonal diversity and copy-number complexity have the clearest near-term prognostic rationale.By contrast, CIN and whole-genome doubling are supported more strongly by evolutionary and mechanistic rather than prospective clinical evidence.Defects in DNA repair, replication stress, and ecDNA represent potential therapeutic vulnerabilities, but their clinical relevance remains to be established.To date, no treatment-predictive biomarkers based on genomic instability have been identified for resectable NSCLC.Direct clinical evidence linking any specific genomic instability feature to the presence or longitudinal dynamics of postoperative molecular residual disease (MRD) remains limited.Postoperative circulating tumor DNA-defined MRD provides prognostic information more directly related to residual disease but remains assay-dependent and should not be considered a genomic-instability phenotype.Therefore, features of genomic instability should remain investigational and should not replace established clinical, pathological, or molecular decision-making.Their near-term value lies in refining biological risk models and generating testable hypotheses for biomarker-defined perioperative trials.Contents 1. Introduction 2. Forms and sources of genomic instability in NSCLC 3. Clonal evolution and tumor heterogeneity 4. Postoperative recurrence biology 5. Genomic instability and MRD 6.I m mune m icro envi ron ment a nd p er iop erat ive immunotherapy 7. Candidate therapeutic vulnerabilities of unstable genomes 8. Translational prioritization and perioperative interpretation 9. Challenges and future directions 10.

Oncology ReportsVol. 56(4)
Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Shenyang Ninth People's Hospital (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.