Indirect comparison of prevalence, risk factors, and mortality in COVID 19 versus influenza associated pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill adults

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is a severe complication of viral pneumonia in critically ill patients. COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) and influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) are increasingly recognized as significant contributors to morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). However, no study has systematically compared their prevalence, risk factor profiles, and attributable mortality within a single evidence synthesis. We therefore undertook an indirect comparative meta-analysis, in which CAPA and IAPA estimates were pooled separately and then contrasted indirectly, rather than compared head-to-head within the same patients. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to March 31, 2025. Eligible studies were observational cohort or case-control studies reporting on CAPA or IAPA in adult ICU patients. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation with DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models. Risk factors and attributable mortality were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All-cause mortality was the only mortality outcome analysed and is referred to as such throughout. CAPA and IAPA were not compared at the individual-patient level; instead, separately pooled estimates were contrasted indirectly using tests for subgroup differences, and 95% prediction intervals, together with the between-study variance τ², were derived for all pooled estimates. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261365038) and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines. A total of 89 studies (68 CAPA, 21 IAPA) encompassing 19,482 critically ill patients were included. The pooled prevalence of CAPA in ICU patients was 10.2% (95% CI 8.1–12.6%; I² = 87%; τ² = 0.004; 95% prediction interval 3.7–19.6%), compared with 19.4% (95% CI 14.8–24.6%; I² = 83%; τ² = 0.004; 95% prediction interval 10.2–30.8%) for IAPA ( p < 0.001). Pooled all-cause mortality was 51.2% (95% CI 44.8–57.5%; 95% prediction interval 31.3–70.9%) for CAPA and 51.8% (95% CI 43.1–60.4%; 95% prediction interval 36.6–66.9%) for IAPA ( p = 0.92). Attributable mortality ORs were 2.65 (2.04–3.45) for CAPA and 2.44 (1.75–3.40) for IAPA ( p = 0.68). The separately pooled prevalence of IAPA was nearly two-fold higher than that of CAPA in ICU patients, yet both conditions were associated with all-cause mortality exceeding 50%. These findings underscore the need for routine fungal surveillance protocols in patients with severe influenza and COVID-19. Because the comparison between CAPA and IAPA was indirect and based on observational studies, the reported associations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than causal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-68899-4
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indirect comparison of prevalence, risk factors, and mortality in COVID 19 versus influenza associated pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill adults

Abdullah A. Awadh, Omar A. Arzoun, Mohammad S. Alhazmi, Awadh M. Alhawiti et al.
Scientific Reports
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
article

Indirect comparison of prevalence, risk factors, and mortality in COVID 19 versus influenza associated pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill adults

Abdullah A. Awadh, Omar A. Arzoun, Mohammad S. Alhazmi, Awadh M. Alhawiti, Abdulmajeed A. Alshehri, Ahmed H. Meny
article en

Abstract

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is a severe complication of viral pneumonia in critically ill patients. COVID-19–associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) and influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) are increasingly recognized as significant contributors to morbidity and mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). However, no study has systematically compared their prevalence, risk factor profiles, and attributable mortality within a single evidence synthesis. We therefore undertook an indirect comparative meta-analysis, in which CAPA and IAPA estimates were pooled separately and then contrasted indirectly, rather than compared head-to-head within the same patients. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to March 31, 2025. Eligible studies were observational cohort or case-control studies reporting on CAPA or IAPA in adult ICU patients. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation with DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models. Risk factors and attributable mortality were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All-cause mortality was the only mortality outcome analysed and is referred to as such throughout. CAPA and IAPA were not compared at the individual-patient level; instead, separately pooled estimates were contrasted indirectly using tests for subgroup differences, and 95% prediction intervals, together with the between-study variance τ², were derived for all pooled estimates. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261365038) and reported in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 and MOOSE guidelines. A total of 89 studies (68 CAPA, 21 IAPA) encompassing 19,482 critically ill patients were included. The pooled prevalence of CAPA in ICU patients was 10.2% (95% CI 8.1–12.6%; I² = 87%; τ² = 0.004; 95% prediction interval 3.7–19.6%), compared with 19.4% (95% CI 14.8–24.6%; I² = 83%; τ² = 0.004; 95% prediction interval 10.2–30.8%) for IAPA ( p < 0.001). Pooled all-cause mortality was 51.2% (95% CI 44.8–57.5%; 95% prediction interval 31.3–70.9%) for CAPA and 51.8% (95% CI 43.1–60.4%; 95% prediction interval 36.6–66.9%) for IAPA ( p = 0.92). Attributable mortality ORs were 2.65 (2.04–3.45) for CAPA and 2.44 (1.75–3.40) for IAPA ( p = 0.68). The separately pooled prevalence of IAPA was nearly two-fold higher than that of CAPA in ICU patients, yet both conditions were associated with all-cause mortality exceeding 50%. These findings underscore the need for routine fungal surveillance protocols in patients with severe influenza and COVID-19. Because the comparison between CAPA and IAPA was indirect and based on observational studies, the reported associations should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than causal.

Scientific Reports
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.