What University signs might tell us about contemporary pedagogic practices

Abstract University teaching and learning spaces are saturated with signage that signals how we understand academic classroom activity, yet these artefacts remain unexamined within learning environments research. This paper positions such signage not as neutral directives but as artefacts that work to actively shape and narrate how teaching, learning, and bodies are governed in contemporary higher education. Drawing on photomapping, categorisation, and critical semiotic analysis of signage across teaching and learning spaces in an English and a Swedish university, the study demonstrates how these messages can construct classrooms as depersonalised, tightly controlled environments in which technological systems are privileged and embodied presence is framed as a potential disruption. By foregrounding signage as consequential, the paper advances theoretical understandings of how material-semiotic arrangements shape pedagogical discourse and practice. Suggestively, we need to reimagine campus environments that narrate and discursively support more relational, humane, and innovative forms of teaching and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Environments Research
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-026-09601-3
Primary Topic
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What University signs might tell us about contemporary pedagogic practices

Susanne Strömberg Jämsvi, Emily Danvers
Learning Environments Research
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
article

What University signs might tell us about contemporary pedagogic practices

Susanne Strömberg Jämsvi, Emily Danvers
article en

Abstract

Abstract University teaching and learning spaces are saturated with signage that signals how we understand academic classroom activity, yet these artefacts remain unexamined within learning environments research. This paper positions such signage not as neutral directives but as artefacts that work to actively shape and narrate how teaching, learning, and bodies are governed in contemporary higher education. Drawing on photomapping, categorisation, and critical semiotic analysis of signage across teaching and learning spaces in an English and a Swedish university, the study demonstrates how these messages can construct classrooms as depersonalised, tightly controlled environments in which technological systems are privileged and embodied presence is framed as a potential disruption. By foregrounding signage as consequential, the paper advances theoretical understandings of how material-semiotic arrangements shape pedagogical discourse and practice. Suggestively, we need to reimagine campus environments that narrate and discursively support more relational, humane, and innovative forms of teaching and learning.

Learning Environments ResearchVol. 29(2)
University of Sussex (GB), University of Borås (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What University signs might tell us about contemporary pedagogic practices — Susanne Strömberg Jämsvi, Emily Danvers · Learning Environments Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS