Current-Time Typhoon-Induced Storm Surge Estimation at Lianyungang: A Fully Nested Event-Grouped Evaluation

Storm surge current-time estimations are strongly influenced by recent water-level conditions, while the temporal dependence among samples from the same typhoon event can complicate the assessment of model generalization to unseen events. This study evaluated storm surge estimation at the Lianyungang tide gauge using 2168 samples from 28 typhoon events during 2002–2024. A 41-feature extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model integrating historical surge and physics-motivated information was evaluated using fully nested event-grouped cross-validation, with complete outer-test typhoon events excluded from hyperparameter optimization, early stopping, and model fitting. The 41-feature XGBoost model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.083 m, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.128 m, and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.794. On the common valid sample subset, its RMSE was 9.15% lower than that of Persistence, and it achieved a lower event-level RMSE in 18 of the 28 independently held-out typhoon events. Controlled information-source experiments showed that historical surge information accounted for most of the aggregate predictive skill, whereas adding core storm-state variables and the complete set of physics-motivated descriptors produced only limited changes in overall performance. The relative improvement over Persistence was larger for samples in which the shortest available historical surge lag was 3–6 h than for those with a 1 h lag, but this advantage did not extend consistently to the highest-surge conditions, where systematic underestimation remained evident. These results demonstrate the importance of event-independent validation for assessing machine-learning storm surge estimation and show that the model skill depends strongly on both information availability and the surge magnitude. The framework should be interpreted as a retrospective, single-station current-time estimation approach rather than an operational forecasting or extreme-surge warning system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14171589
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current-Time Typhoon-Induced Storm Surge Estimation at Lianyungang: A Fully Nested Event-Grouped Evaluation

Shuaikang Zhao, Wenli Qiao, Xue Li, Rui Liu et al.
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
article

Current-Time Typhoon-Induced Storm Surge Estimation at Lianyungang: A Fully Nested Event-Grouped Evaluation

Shuaikang Zhao, Wenli Qiao, Xue Li, Rui Liu, Dewei Wang, Jierui Tang
article en

Abstract

Storm surge current-time estimations are strongly influenced by recent water-level conditions, while the temporal dependence among samples from the same typhoon event can complicate the assessment of model generalization to unseen events. This study evaluated storm surge estimation at the Lianyungang tide gauge using 2168 samples from 28 typhoon events during 2002–2024. A 41-feature extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model integrating historical surge and physics-motivated information was evaluated using fully nested event-grouped cross-validation, with complete outer-test typhoon events excluded from hyperparameter optimization, early stopping, and model fitting. The 41-feature XGBoost model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.083 m, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.128 m, and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.794. On the common valid sample subset, its RMSE was 9.15% lower than that of Persistence, and it achieved a lower event-level RMSE in 18 of the 28 independently held-out typhoon events. Controlled information-source experiments showed that historical surge information accounted for most of the aggregate predictive skill, whereas adding core storm-state variables and the complete set of physics-motivated descriptors produced only limited changes in overall performance. The relative improvement over Persistence was larger for samples in which the shortest available historical surge lag was 3–6 h than for those with a 1 h lag, but this advantage did not extend consistently to the highest-surge conditions, where systematic underestimation remained evident. These results demonstrate the importance of event-independent validation for assessing machine-learning storm surge estimation and show that the model skill depends strongly on both information availability and the surge magnitude. The framework should be interpreted as a retrospective, single-station current-time estimation approach rather than an operational forecasting or extreme-surge warning system.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 14(17)
Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary (CN), Shanghai Ocean University (CN), Ocean University of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.