Sources of Potential Predictability for July–August 2025 Extreme Precipitation Anomalies Over Northern China: Roles of the Western Pacific and North Atlantic–Barents–Kara Sea Sectors

Abstract Accurately predicting persistent extreme precipitation remains a major challenge for subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) prediction models. This study identifies two distinct sources of predictability for the July and August 2025 extreme precipitation anomalies over northern China (NC) and reveals how these remote signals improved the prediction. By separating S2S models into high‐skill and low‐skill groups, we show that the July predictability was mainly linked to tropical forcing over the western Pacific (WP), whereas the August predictability was primarily associated with midlatitude wave‐train activity from the North Atlantic (NA) and Barents–Kara Seas (BKS). In July, high‐skill models better captured typhoon‐induced convection over the subtropical WP and the associated northward‐propagating Pacific–Japan wave train. This circulation response favored westward moisture transport from the warm WP along the edge of the northward‐extended western Pacific subtropical high, thereby improving the prediction of NC precipitation. In August, high‐skill models more realistically represented eastward‐propagating midlatitude wave trains from the NA and BKS. These wave trains enhanced energy conversion over NC and contributed to a more accurate prediction of the August extreme precipitation anomaly. Although the S2S models showed clear indications of predictability, most models underestimated the precipitation intensity, highlighting persistent model deficiencies in representing the amplitude of extreme rainfall. Nudging experiments further quantified the contribution of these remote predictable signals. Correcting WP circulation and convection‐related anomalies explained approximately 78% of the July intensity improvement, while correcting NA and BKS wave‐train anomalies explained approximately 46% and 66% of the August improvement, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026jd047254
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sources of Potential Predictability for July–August 2025 Extreme Precipitation Anomalies Over Northern China: Roles of the Western Pacific and North Atlantic–Barents–Kara Sea Sectors

Bian He, Chen Sheng, N. V. Vazaeva, Guoxiong Wu et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Climate variability and models
article

Sources of Potential Predictability for July–August 2025 Extreme Precipitation Anomalies Over Northern China: Roles of the Western Pacific and North Atlantic–Barents–Kara Sea Sectors

Bian He, Chen Sheng, N. V. Vazaeva, Guoxiong Wu, Yimin Liu, Xinyu He, Bin Tang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurately predicting persistent extreme precipitation remains a major challenge for subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) prediction models. This study identifies two distinct sources of predictability for the July and August 2025 extreme precipitation anomalies over northern China (NC) and reveals how these remote signals improved the prediction. By separating S2S models into high‐skill and low‐skill groups, we show that the July predictability was mainly linked to tropical forcing over the western Pacific (WP), whereas the August predictability was primarily associated with midlatitude wave‐train activity from the North Atlantic (NA) and Barents–Kara Seas (BKS). In July, high‐skill models better captured typhoon‐induced convection over the subtropical WP and the associated northward‐propagating Pacific–Japan wave train. This circulation response favored westward moisture transport from the warm WP along the edge of the northward‐extended western Pacific subtropical high, thereby improving the prediction of NC precipitation. In August, high‐skill models more realistically represented eastward‐propagating midlatitude wave trains from the NA and BKS. These wave trains enhanced energy conversion over NC and contributed to a more accurate prediction of the August extreme precipitation anomaly. Although the S2S models showed clear indications of predictability, most models underestimated the precipitation intensity, highlighting persistent model deficiencies in representing the amplitude of extreme rainfall. Nudging experiments further quantified the contribution of these remote predictable signals. Correcting WP circulation and convection‐related anomalies explained approximately 78% of the July intensity improvement, while correcting NA and BKS wave‐train anomalies explained approximately 46% and 66% of the August improvement, respectively.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(17)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics (RU), Institute of Atmospheric Physics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Climate variability and models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.