The impact of maternal incarceration on mothers and children: A scoping review protocol

Globally, female incarceration rates have risen in recent decades. Estimates indicate that between 60-80% of incarcerated women are mothers. Maternal incarceration (MI) is associated with negative and often enduring implications for both the mother and child. Recognising the risk of harmful outcomes, evidence-based support for both populations is essential. However, this broad research topic draws interest from academics and practitioners across many distinct but overlapping disciplines, each with different priorities, and methodological and theoretical approaches. Interdisciplinary collaboration remains rare. Consequently, available evidence is spread across different platforms and lacks overview, making it difficult to identify and access key findings, or establish where research gaps exist. Together, these factors hinder researchers and practitioners and constrain efforts to develop evidence‑based support, a task often undertaken by non-governmental organisations already operating with limited resources. Addressing the current lack of overview, this review aims to systematically map the available primary and secondary evidence. Specifically, we seek to explore the overarching research question: 'What empirical evidence is available that documents the impact of MI on (a) mothers and (b) children?' Following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual and Population/Concept/Context framework, a comprehensive search will be conducted across six multidisciplinary databases. Relevant papers will be exported to Covidence and screened by independent reviewers against pre-established inclusion criteria. Included papers will be mapped and relevant information charted using EPPI-Reviewer. Findings will document the scope of the available evidence and identify gaps in our current understanding, creating a helpful resource that can inform future research, advise policy and practice, and guide evidence-based support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355209
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of maternal incarceration on mothers and children: A scoping review protocol

A. S. Parkes, Anca Minescu, Daragh Bradshaw, R Galvin et al.
PLoS ONE
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

The impact of maternal incarceration on mothers and children: A scoping review protocol

A. S. Parkes, Anca Minescu, Daragh Bradshaw, R Galvin, Fiona Donson, Srijani Bose, Luke Slattery, Lynn Fenton, Leonie Ludwig, Elaine Rogers
article en

Abstract

Globally, female incarceration rates have risen in recent decades. Estimates indicate that between 60-80% of incarcerated women are mothers. Maternal incarceration (MI) is associated with negative and often enduring implications for both the mother and child. Recognising the risk of harmful outcomes, evidence-based support for both populations is essential. However, this broad research topic draws interest from academics and practitioners across many distinct but overlapping disciplines, each with different priorities, and methodological and theoretical approaches. Interdisciplinary collaboration remains rare. Consequently, available evidence is spread across different platforms and lacks overview, making it difficult to identify and access key findings, or establish where research gaps exist. Together, these factors hinder researchers and practitioners and constrain efforts to develop evidence‑based support, a task often undertaken by non-governmental organisations already operating with limited resources. Addressing the current lack of overview, this review aims to systematically map the available primary and secondary evidence. Specifically, we seek to explore the overarching research question: 'What empirical evidence is available that documents the impact of MI on (a) mothers and (b) children?' Following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual and Population/Concept/Context framework, a comprehensive search will be conducted across six multidisciplinary databases. Relevant papers will be exported to Covidence and screened by independent reviewers against pre-established inclusion criteria. Included papers will be mapped and relevant information charted using EPPI-Reviewer. Findings will document the scope of the available evidence and identify gaps in our current understanding, creating a helpful resource that can inform future research, advise policy and practice, and guide evidence-based support.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
University of Limerick (IE), University College Cork (IE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.