Review of Benjamin Miller (2026) Against Aristotelian character education: Practical wisdom, flourishing, and liberal democracy —Routledge

The thesis of Benjamin Miller’s Against Aristotelian Character Education is that liberal democracy and government-sponsored Aristotelian Character Education (ACE) are incompatible. The central argument is that: (1) liberal democratic respect for free and equal citizenship precludes government-sponsored education that imposes a conception of a good life that is at odds with other reasonable conceptions of a good life; (2) government-sponsored ACE would impose a conception of a good life that is at odds with other reasonable conceptions of a good life. This review accepts the first of these premises but disputes the second. It argues that: (a) coercive imposition of Aristotle’s conception of a good life would be inconsistent with the value Aristotle assigns to intellectual autonomy; (b) Aristotle did not conceive of the ethical knowledge that is essential to practical wisdom and genuine virtue as something that could or would be coercively imposed; (c) there are reasons to regard common schooling, promotion of flourishing, and disciplinary and inquiry-based practical wisdom as defining strengths of ACE within a liberal-democratic framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Moral Education
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2026.2715907
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Values and Moral Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Review of Benjamin Miller (2026) Against Aristotelian character education: Practical wisdom, flourishing, and liberal democracy —Routledge

Randall Curren
1 citations
Journal of Moral Education
Values and Moral Education
36.50
article

Review of Benjamin Miller (2026) Against Aristotelian character education: Practical wisdom, flourishing, and liberal democracy —Routledge

Randall Curren
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The thesis of Benjamin Miller’s Against Aristotelian Character Education is that liberal democracy and government-sponsored Aristotelian Character Education (ACE) are incompatible. The central argument is that: (1) liberal democratic respect for free and equal citizenship precludes government-sponsored education that imposes a conception of a good life that is at odds with other reasonable conceptions of a good life; (2) government-sponsored ACE would impose a conception of a good life that is at odds with other reasonable conceptions of a good life. This review accepts the first of these premises but disputes the second. It argues that: (a) coercive imposition of Aristotle’s conception of a good life would be inconsistent with the value Aristotle assigns to intellectual autonomy; (b) Aristotle did not conceive of the ethical knowledge that is essential to practical wisdom and genuine virtue as something that could or would be coercively imposed; (c) there are reasons to regard common schooling, promotion of flourishing, and disciplinary and inquiry-based practical wisdom as defining strengths of ACE within a liberal-democratic framework.

Journal of Moral Education
University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Values and Moral Education
36.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.