Replicating Palestine in India: a comparison of the architectural violence of the Indian and Israeli states

Examining architecture as the site of direct and indirect violence, this paper compares the state-authored demolitions performed by government authorities in India to those carried out by the Israeli authorities in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). In both cases, the targeted communities are subject to “terror talk” which justifies state-sanctioned violence more generally. Placing this comparison within a conceptual framework of architectural violence, it draws parallels between multiple dimensions of state-sanctioned demolitions in the two cases. The comparison is made across two registers: the official rhetoric surrounding the demolitions and the methods employed to construct and selectively invoke the illegality of structures in the two geographies. Through these comparisons, I explore the state’s political utilisation of planning, development and law enforcement to deliberately dispossess targeted communities, framed as “suspect,” “terrorist,” and “other,” in the service of exclusivist nation-building or state-building projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Studies on Terrorism
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2026.2716924
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Replicating Palestine in India: a comparison of the architectural violence of the Indian and Israeli states

Bilal Ahmad Tantray
Critical Studies on Terrorism
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

Replicating Palestine in India: a comparison of the architectural violence of the Indian and Israeli states

Bilal Ahmad Tantray
article en

Abstract

Examining architecture as the site of direct and indirect violence, this paper compares the state-authored demolitions performed by government authorities in India to those carried out by the Israeli authorities in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT). In both cases, the targeted communities are subject to “terror talk” which justifies state-sanctioned violence more generally. Placing this comparison within a conceptual framework of architectural violence, it draws parallels between multiple dimensions of state-sanctioned demolitions in the two cases. The comparison is made across two registers: the official rhetoric surrounding the demolitions and the methods employed to construct and selectively invoke the illegality of structures in the two geographies. Through these comparisons, I explore the state’s political utilisation of planning, development and law enforcement to deliberately dispossess targeted communities, framed as “suspect,” “terrorist,” and “other,” in the service of exclusivist nation-building or state-building projects.

Critical Studies on Terrorism
Shiv Nadar University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.