Barriers to pursuing ophthalmology among medical students

Background: Underrepresented in medicine (URM) medical students pursuing ophthalmology are notably scarce. As racial concordance improves health outcomes, understanding perceived barriers is of utmost importance. Limited data exists regarding factors that inform URM medical students’ decisions for declining to pursue ophthalmology. Purpose: To investigate factors associated with students’ motivations and decision-making process with regard to pursuing ophthalmology. Methods: From 2019 to 2022, fourth-year medical students at the University of Michigan who were not pursuing ophthalmology completed a questionnaire assessing intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence specialty choice. Using Likert scales, students rated the importance of salary, research, and minority climate (1-5; 5 indicating most important), as well as exposure and personal factors (1-4; 4 indicating most important), and reasons for not choosing ophthalmology, such as diversity and outpatient interest (1-3; 1 indicating most deterring factor). These were labeled as career prospects, career exposure, and specialty-specific factors, respectively. Welch’s t test was used to compare responses between URM and non-URM students. Results: Of 683 students who were approached, 200 participated (response rate = 29.3%). Of these, 175 self-identified as non-URM and 25 as URM. Financial compensation was more important for URM students (M = 3.3/5) than non-URM students (M = 3.1/5 [p = 0.03]). Likewise, research opportunities were also less important for URM students (M = 2.3/5) than for non-URM students (M = 2.9/5 [p < 0.01]). URM applicants were less deterred by outpatient aspects of ophthalmology (M = 2.9/3; lower score indicates increased deterrent) than non-URM peers (M = 2.6/3 [p < 0.01]). When it came to selecting ophthalmology, a lack of diversity in the field was a higher deterrent for URM students (M = 2.38/3; lower score indicates increased deterrent) than for non-URM students (M = 2.75/3 [p = 0.02]). Conclusion: Fourth-year URM students consider factors such as the climate for minorities at an institution, lack of diversity in ophthalmology, and financial compensation more strongly than non-URM students when choosing a specialty. The current lack of diversity within ophthalmology may contribute to URM students’ decisions not to apply to ophthalmology. These findings underscore the importance of diversifying the ophthalmic workforce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62199/2475-4757.1356
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Barriers to pursuing ophthalmology among medical students

Mickey Nguyen, Keith Miller, Shahzad I. Mian, Mana Yacim et al.
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Diversity and Career in Medicine
article

Barriers to pursuing ophthalmology among medical students

Mickey Nguyen, Keith Miller, Shahzad I. Mian, Mana Yacim, Karthik Reddy, Ariane Kaplan, Anjali R. Shah
article en

Abstract

Background: Underrepresented in medicine (URM) medical students pursuing ophthalmology are notably scarce. As racial concordance improves health outcomes, understanding perceived barriers is of utmost importance. Limited data exists regarding factors that inform URM medical students’ decisions for declining to pursue ophthalmology. Purpose: To investigate factors associated with students’ motivations and decision-making process with regard to pursuing ophthalmology. Methods: From 2019 to 2022, fourth-year medical students at the University of Michigan who were not pursuing ophthalmology completed a questionnaire assessing intrinsic and extrinsic factors that influence specialty choice. Using Likert scales, students rated the importance of salary, research, and minority climate (1-5; 5 indicating most important), as well as exposure and personal factors (1-4; 4 indicating most important), and reasons for not choosing ophthalmology, such as diversity and outpatient interest (1-3; 1 indicating most deterring factor). These were labeled as career prospects, career exposure, and specialty-specific factors, respectively. Welch’s t test was used to compare responses between URM and non-URM students. Results: Of 683 students who were approached, 200 participated (response rate = 29.3%). Of these, 175 self-identified as non-URM and 25 as URM. Financial compensation was more important for URM students (M = 3.3/5) than non-URM students (M = 3.1/5 [p = 0.03]). Likewise, research opportunities were also less important for URM students (M = 2.3/5) than for non-URM students (M = 2.9/5 [p < 0.01]). URM applicants were less deterred by outpatient aspects of ophthalmology (M = 2.9/3; lower score indicates increased deterrent) than non-URM peers (M = 2.6/3 [p < 0.01]). When it came to selecting ophthalmology, a lack of diversity in the field was a higher deterrent for URM students (M = 2.38/3; lower score indicates increased deterrent) than for non-URM students (M = 2.75/3 [p = 0.02]). Conclusion: Fourth-year URM students consider factors such as the climate for minorities at an institution, lack of diversity in ophthalmology, and financial compensation more strongly than non-URM students when choosing a specialty. The current lack of diversity within ophthalmology may contribute to URM students’ decisions not to apply to ophthalmology. These findings underscore the importance of diversifying the ophthalmic workforce.

Journal of Academic OphthalmologyVol. 18(2)
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Michigan (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.