Treatment of elderly patients with advanced (M1) gallbladder cancer – Aggressive or conservative?

The optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients with distant metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC, M1) remains controversial. We extracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for 528 elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) diagnosed with M1 GBC between 2000 and 2020. Patients were stratified by age (60–69, 70–79, ≥80 years) and treatment received: no surgery or chemotherapy (Group N), surgery alone (Group S), chemotherapy alone (Group C), or surgery combined with chemotherapy (Group B). Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. In the 60–69 age group, Group B had the longest mean survival (8.94 ± 6.71 months) and the best survival curve. In the 70–79 group, all active treatments were protective, with Group B showing the strongest benefit (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.07–0.39, P < .001) and a mean survival of 9.92 ± 5.46 months. In the ≥ 80 group, Group B also yielded the longest mean survival (10.54 ± 9.68 months) with significantly better survival curves. Surgery combined with chemotherapy appears to improve prognosis in elderly M1 GBC patients, particularly in those aged 70–79 years, and should be considered a protective factor. However, the retrospective nature, lack of performance status and detailed treatment data, and small subgroup sizes warrant caution in interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050380
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment of elderly patients with advanced (M1) gallbladder cancer – Aggressive or conservative?

Zhou Ti, Penghua Weng, Bin He, Haibin Lan
Medicine
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

Treatment of elderly patients with advanced (M1) gallbladder cancer – Aggressive or conservative?

Zhou Ti, Penghua Weng, Bin He, Haibin Lan
article en

Abstract

The optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients with distant metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC, M1) remains controversial. We extracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for 528 elderly patients (aged ≥ 60 years) diagnosed with M1 GBC between 2000 and 2020. Patients were stratified by age (60–69, 70–79, ≥80 years) and treatment received: no surgery or chemotherapy (Group N), surgery alone (Group S), chemotherapy alone (Group C), or surgery combined with chemotherapy (Group B). Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. In the 60–69 age group, Group B had the longest mean survival (8.94 ± 6.71 months) and the best survival curve. In the 70–79 group, all active treatments were protective, with Group B showing the strongest benefit (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.07–0.39, P < .001) and a mean survival of 9.92 ± 5.46 months. In the ≥ 80 group, Group B also yielded the longest mean survival (10.54 ± 9.68 months) with significantly better survival curves. Surgery combined with chemotherapy appears to improve prognosis in elderly M1 GBC patients, particularly in those aged 70–79 years, and should be considered a protective factor. However, the retrospective nature, lack of performance status and detailed treatment data, and small subgroup sizes warrant caution in interpretation.

MedicineVol. 105(35)
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.