Machine Learning-Informed Hydrological Response Time Modeling in Tropical Watersheds

Flood occurrence in tropical regions is intensifying due to climate variability and land-use change, increasing the need for reliable flood response time estimation. Accurate prediction of flood lag time (TL)—the interval between the centroid of excess rainfall and peak runoff—is critical for flood early warning and water resource planning. However, TL estimation remains challenging in data-scarce regions because of complex interactions among watershed morphology, rainfall characteristics, and runoff generation processes. This study evaluates four machine learning (ML) algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—for predicting TL across twenty gauged watersheds in the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Fourteen physiographic and hydro-climatic watershed characteristics were used as predictors. Among the tested models, XGBoost achieved the highest training performance (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.96), while RF showed better generalization in the test dataset (R2 = 0.77, NSE = 0.70, KGE = 0.71). SVM produced the lowest prediction errors (MAE = 0.95; RMSE = 2.25) but had lower explanatory power (R2 = 0.49). To enhance interpretability and practical applicability, ML-based feature importance was used to develop a parsimonious empirical model: TL = 0.8 + 0.011A − 0.023RI, where A is watershed area and RI is rainfall intensity. This model explained 51% of TL variability and retained much of the predictive skill of more complex ML models. The proposed hybrid ML–empirical framework provides a transparent and operational approach for flood response time estimation in tropical highland watersheds. Its broader applicability remains subject to additional watershed-level validation and regional calibration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18172121
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Informed Hydrological Response Time Modeling in Tropical Watersheds

Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Mitsuru Tsubo, Bewuketu Abebe Tesfaw et al.
Water
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Machine Learning-Informed Hydrological Response Time Modeling in Tropical Watersheds

Atsushi Tsunekawa, Nigussie Haregeweyn, Mitsuru Tsubo, Bewuketu Abebe Tesfaw, Ayele Almaw Fenta, Tena Alamirew, Dagnenet Sultan, Demesew A. Mhiret, Samuel Berihun Kassa, Ayele Mamo
article en

Abstract

Flood occurrence in tropical regions is intensifying due to climate variability and land-use change, increasing the need for reliable flood response time estimation. Accurate prediction of flood lag time (TL)—the interval between the centroid of excess rainfall and peak runoff—is critical for flood early warning and water resource planning. However, TL estimation remains challenging in data-scarce regions because of complex interactions among watershed morphology, rainfall characteristics, and runoff generation processes. This study evaluates four machine learning (ML) algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—for predicting TL across twenty gauged watersheds in the Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Fourteen physiographic and hydro-climatic watershed characteristics were used as predictors. Among the tested models, XGBoost achieved the highest training performance (R2 = 0.98, NSE = 0.96), while RF showed better generalization in the test dataset (R2 = 0.77, NSE = 0.70, KGE = 0.71). SVM produced the lowest prediction errors (MAE = 0.95; RMSE = 2.25) but had lower explanatory power (R2 = 0.49). To enhance interpretability and practical applicability, ML-based feature importance was used to develop a parsimonious empirical model: TL = 0.8 + 0.011A − 0.023RI, where A is watershed area and RI is rainfall intensity. This model explained 51% of TL variability and retained much of the predictive skill of more complex ML models. The proposed hybrid ML–empirical framework provides a transparent and operational approach for flood response time estimation in tropical highland watersheds. Its broader applicability remains subject to additional watershed-level validation and regional calibration.

WaterVol. 18(17)
Water and Land Resource Centre (ET), Addis Ababa University (ET), Tottori University (JP), Bahir Dar University (ET), Debre Markos University (ET)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.