Say What You Know: Administering Group Oral Examinations in Undergraduate and Graduate Courses

or more than two decades, university professors at the institute of study have implemented group oral examinations as a summative assessment strategy within their courses. This essay offers a critical reflection on the pedagogical benefits of this format, examining its impact on both instructors and students, while also addressing the practical and logistical challenges encountered in its sustained use. In the context of the rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence and the corresponding complications it introduces for traditional assessment practices, the authors argue that group oral examinations have gained renewed significance. Specifically, they highlight the capacity of this approach to promote authentic demonstration of student learning and to cultivate communication, collaboration, and critical thinking skills that are essential for post-graduate professional contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal on teaching and learning in higher education
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7771/1812-9129.1148
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Say What You Know: Administering Group Oral Examinations in Undergraduate and Graduate Courses

Lenore Wright, Andrew Arterbury
International journal on teaching and learning in higher education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Say What You Know: Administering Group Oral Examinations in Undergraduate and Graduate Courses

Lenore Wright, Andrew Arterbury
article en

Abstract

or more than two decades, university professors at the institute of study have implemented group oral examinations as a summative assessment strategy within their courses. This essay offers a critical reflection on the pedagogical benefits of this format, examining its impact on both instructors and students, while also addressing the practical and logistical challenges encountered in its sustained use. In the context of the rapid proliferation of artificial intelligence and the corresponding complications it introduces for traditional assessment practices, the authors argue that group oral examinations have gained renewed significance. Specifically, they highlight the capacity of this approach to promote authentic demonstration of student learning and to cultivate communication, collaboration, and critical thinking skills that are essential for post-graduate professional contexts.

International journal on teaching and learning in higher educationVol. 36(2)
Baylor University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Say What You Know: Administering Group Oral Examinations in Undergraduate and Graduate Courses — Lenore Wright, Andrew Arterbury · International journal on teaching and learning in higher education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS