A Decision Support Tool for Determining the Suitable Multifunctional Digital Twin Maturity Levels in Construction Projects

Abstract Digital twin (DT) is a purpose-driven technology, and its suitable maturity level for a specific project depends on the project’s requirements, informed by the adoption drivers that may reflect both project-level needs and organizational strategy. However, to date, no tool or framework exists to assist decision makers in determining the suitable DT maturity level for a project, while a mismatched level of maturity results in the failure of the project to achieve its objectives. To fill this gap, this research aims to develop a decision support tool (DST) to determine the suitable DT maturity level for a project, considering the significance of the drivers for DT adoption as well as the current state of the project. To this end, the drivers for adopting DTs are identified using a novel large language model–based multicriteria decision-making approach. Then, given the limitations of existing maturity model for multifunctional DTs, a novel four-dimensional DT maturity model (including data and technology, business, decision making, and the relationship between the DT and the physical asset) is developed using a design science research approach. The suitable maturity ranges for each driver are then identified across each dimension. Finally, a DST is developed and validated using expert opinion and real-life case studies. The research concludes that the DST provides stakeholders with high-level insights regarding the suitable DT maturity levels—essential for stakeholder buy-in—assists them in making data-driven decisions especially during the front-end planning stage, and helps determine realistic technology objectives that contribute to project success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-17977
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Decision Support Tool for Determining the Suitable Multifunctional Digital Twin Maturity Levels in Construction Projects

Amir Mahdiyar, Soheil Sabri, Sigrid Adriaenssens
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

A Decision Support Tool for Determining the Suitable Multifunctional Digital Twin Maturity Levels in Construction Projects

Amir Mahdiyar, Soheil Sabri, Sigrid Adriaenssens
article en

Abstract

Abstract Digital twin (DT) is a purpose-driven technology, and its suitable maturity level for a specific project depends on the project’s requirements, informed by the adoption drivers that may reflect both project-level needs and organizational strategy. However, to date, no tool or framework exists to assist decision makers in determining the suitable DT maturity level for a project, while a mismatched level of maturity results in the failure of the project to achieve its objectives. To fill this gap, this research aims to develop a decision support tool (DST) to determine the suitable DT maturity level for a project, considering the significance of the drivers for DT adoption as well as the current state of the project. To this end, the drivers for adopting DTs are identified using a novel large language model–based multicriteria decision-making approach. Then, given the limitations of existing maturity model for multifunctional DTs, a novel four-dimensional DT maturity model (including data and technology, business, decision making, and the relationship between the DT and the physical asset) is developed using a design science research approach. The suitable maturity ranges for each driver are then identified across each dimension. Finally, a DST is developed and validated using expert opinion and real-life case studies. The research concludes that the DST provides stakeholders with high-level insights regarding the suitable DT maturity levels—essential for stakeholder buy-in—assists them in making data-driven decisions especially during the front-end planning stage, and helps determine realistic technology objectives that contribute to project success.

Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementVol. 152(11)
University of Central Florida (US), Princeton University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.