Gaps in Computational Training in Undergraduate Biology Programs: Misalignment with Workforce Expectations in the Biosciences

To prepare students for emerging research technologies and careers in the life sciences, computational thinking and skills are increasingly essential in undergraduate biology programs. However, curricular change has not kept pace with the evolving demands of the biosciences workforce. At an independent, nonprofit research institute operating at the intersection of genetics and genomics and spanning academic research and biotechnology sectors, we observe a growing need for trainees and early-career scientists with both biological and computational expertise. To examine the alignment between workforce expectations and undergraduate preparation, we analyzed job descriptions at our institute over time and interviewed and surveyed faculty across the country to collect perspectives on undergraduate biology curricula. Our findings indicate that computational skills are increasingly emphasized in entry-level life science positions, while undergraduate biology curricula do not consistently reflect these expectations. Faculty reported persistent gaps in bioinformatics, computational biology, and data science, as well as barriers that constrain curricular updates. By comparing workforce expectations with faculty-reported challenges, this study provides insight into feasible pathways for integrating computational thinking and skills within existing curricular structures to better prepare students for careers in the biosciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The journal of college science teaching
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0047231x.2026.2722111
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps in Computational Training in Undergraduate Biology Programs: Misalignment with Workforce Expectations in the Biosciences

Therese Ingram Nissen, Erica L. Gerace, Sarah Wojiski, William K. Barter
The journal of college science teaching
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
article

Gaps in Computational Training in Undergraduate Biology Programs: Misalignment with Workforce Expectations in the Biosciences

Therese Ingram Nissen, Erica L. Gerace, Sarah Wojiski, William K. Barter
article en

Abstract

To prepare students for emerging research technologies and careers in the life sciences, computational thinking and skills are increasingly essential in undergraduate biology programs. However, curricular change has not kept pace with the evolving demands of the biosciences workforce. At an independent, nonprofit research institute operating at the intersection of genetics and genomics and spanning academic research and biotechnology sectors, we observe a growing need for trainees and early-career scientists with both biological and computational expertise. To examine the alignment between workforce expectations and undergraduate preparation, we analyzed job descriptions at our institute over time and interviewed and surveyed faculty across the country to collect perspectives on undergraduate biology curricula. Our findings indicate that computational skills are increasingly emphasized in entry-level life science positions, while undergraduate biology curricula do not consistently reflect these expectations. Faculty reported persistent gaps in bioinformatics, computational biology, and data science, as well as barriers that constrain curricular updates. By comparing workforce expectations with faculty-reported challenges, this study provides insight into feasible pathways for integrating computational thinking and skills within existing curricular structures to better prepare students for careers in the biosciences.

The journal of college science teaching
Yale University (US), Jackson Laboratory (US), Center for Genomic Science (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gaps in Computational Training in Undergraduate Biology Programs: Misalignment with Workforce Expectations in the Biosciences — Therese Ingram Nissen, Erica L. Gerace, et al. · The journal of college science teaching (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS