Biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage

PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation (LPWV) and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading. METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen human thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10-L1) were randomly allocated to two experimental groups (n = 10 each). In Group 1, each vertebra received one standard intrapedicular screw and one LPWV screw, with screw trajectories randomly assigned to the left or right pedicle. In Group 2, both pedicles were initially instrumented with LPWV screws; one screw per vertebra was randomly selected for redirection into a standard intrapedicular trajectory, while the contralateral LPWV screw was left in place. All screws were subjected to cyclic cranio-caudal loading with stepwise increasing compressive load until loosening. RESULTS: LPWV screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than standard intrapedicular screws (5230 ± 2481 vs. 8205 ± 3027 cycles; p = 0.003), corresponding to a 36% reduction in anchorage. Redirected screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than LPWV screws left in place (3686 ± 2105 vs. 5489 ± 2731 cycles; p = 0.018), representing an additional 33% reduction. CONCLUSION: LPWV substantially compromises pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading, even when the screw remains at least half contained within the pedicle and fully contained within the vertebral body. Redirection of LPWV screws using the same diameter does not restore fixation strength but is associated with a further reduction in anchorage, challenging the assumption that redirection inherently improves screw stability. Redirection of LPWV screws using screws of the same dimensions and design may therefore be considered with caution, particularly in the absence of neural or vascular compromise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-10333-4
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage

Richard Bostelmann, Anna Spicher, Peter Ferlic, Richard A. Lindtner et al.
European Spine Journal
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage

Richard Bostelmann, Anna Spicher, Peter Ferlic, Richard A. Lindtner, Tim Egelseer, Rene Schmid, Werner Schmoelz, Romed Hörmann
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical effects of lateral pedicle wall violation (LPWV) and subsequent screw redirection on pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading. METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen human thoracolumbar vertebrae (T10-L1) were randomly allocated to two experimental groups (n = 10 each). In Group 1, each vertebra received one standard intrapedicular screw and one LPWV screw, with screw trajectories randomly assigned to the left or right pedicle. In Group 2, both pedicles were initially instrumented with LPWV screws; one screw per vertebra was randomly selected for redirection into a standard intrapedicular trajectory, while the contralateral LPWV screw was left in place. All screws were subjected to cyclic cranio-caudal loading with stepwise increasing compressive load until loosening. RESULTS: LPWV screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than standard intrapedicular screws (5230 ± 2481 vs. 8205 ± 3027 cycles; p = 0.003), corresponding to a 36% reduction in anchorage. Redirected screws withstood significantly fewer load cycles until loosening than LPWV screws left in place (3686 ± 2105 vs. 5489 ± 2731 cycles; p = 0.018), representing an additional 33% reduction. CONCLUSION: LPWV substantially compromises pedicle screw anchorage under cyclic loading, even when the screw remains at least half contained within the pedicle and fully contained within the vertebral body. Redirection of LPWV screws using the same diameter does not restore fixation strength but is associated with a further reduction in anchorage, challenging the assumption that redirection inherently improves screw stability. Redirection of LPWV screws using screws of the same dimensions and design may therefore be considered with caution, particularly in the absence of neural or vascular compromise.

European Spine Journal
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Medical University of Graz (AT), Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf (DE)
Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Universität Innsbruck
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.