A novel indication of Glyaderm®: its use as a nerve wrap in the treatment of compression neuropathies

Abstract Background Fibrotic changes following surgical decompression of nerve entrapment can restrict nerve regeneration, and exert pressure on the nerve, leading to symptoms of recurring entrapment. This case series reports on the outcomes of using Glyaderm® (ETB-BISLIFE Multi Tissue Center, The Netherlands) as a low-cost, customizable, and biocompatible nerve wrap in patients with recurrent or post-traumatic compression neuropathies, highlighting its potential benefits as a neuroprotective shield. Methods We reviewed all patients who presented to the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 2024 and 2025 with compression neuropathies. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics included: age, sex, hand dominance, anatomical location and etiology of nerve entrapment syndrome including surgeries, any postoperative complications during follow-up, subjective symptom improvement, and follow-up time. Results Twenty patients were operated using Glyaderm as a nerve wrap for recurrent or post-traumatic compression neuropathies. Compression neuropathies included the ulnar nerve (35%), median nerve (25%), peroneal nerve (15%), tibial nerve (10%), radial nerve (5%), and in two patients multiple nerves. This was either both the ulnar and radial nerve, or the ulnar and the posterior interosseus nerve (PIN) (10%). There were no postoperative complications in 85% ( n = 17) of the patients. Three patients experienced wound problems, including hematoma, wound dehiscence, and suture irritation. 65% of the patients experienced amelioration of their symptoms. Conclusions Glyaderm appears to be a cost-effective, simple, and well-tolerated adjunct in compression neuropathies. It offers several advantages over existing alternatives, including lower cost, ease of use, and the avoidance of additional donor site morbidity. Future randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up duration are needed to validate its efficacy and define its long-term benefits in peripheral nerve surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-026-02545-0
Primary Topic
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel indication of Glyaderm®: its use as a nerve wrap in the treatment of compression neuropathies

T. Wagner, Milly S van de Warenburg, Claire van Houdt, Stefan Hummelink
European Journal of Plastic Surgery
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
article

A novel indication of Glyaderm®: its use as a nerve wrap in the treatment of compression neuropathies

T. Wagner, Milly S van de Warenburg, Claire van Houdt, Stefan Hummelink
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Fibrotic changes following surgical decompression of nerve entrapment can restrict nerve regeneration, and exert pressure on the nerve, leading to symptoms of recurring entrapment. This case series reports on the outcomes of using Glyaderm® (ETB-BISLIFE Multi Tissue Center, The Netherlands) as a low-cost, customizable, and biocompatible nerve wrap in patients with recurrent or post-traumatic compression neuropathies, highlighting its potential benefits as a neuroprotective shield. Methods We reviewed all patients who presented to the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, The Netherlands, between 2024 and 2025 with compression neuropathies. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics included: age, sex, hand dominance, anatomical location and etiology of nerve entrapment syndrome including surgeries, any postoperative complications during follow-up, subjective symptom improvement, and follow-up time. Results Twenty patients were operated using Glyaderm as a nerve wrap for recurrent or post-traumatic compression neuropathies. Compression neuropathies included the ulnar nerve (35%), median nerve (25%), peroneal nerve (15%), tibial nerve (10%), radial nerve (5%), and in two patients multiple nerves. This was either both the ulnar and radial nerve, or the ulnar and the posterior interosseus nerve (PIN) (10%). There were no postoperative complications in 85% ( n = 17) of the patients. Three patients experienced wound problems, including hematoma, wound dehiscence, and suture irritation. 65% of the patients experienced amelioration of their symptoms. Conclusions Glyaderm appears to be a cost-effective, simple, and well-tolerated adjunct in compression neuropathies. It offers several advantages over existing alternatives, including lower cost, ease of use, and the avoidance of additional donor site morbidity. Future randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up duration are needed to validate its efficacy and define its long-term benefits in peripheral nerve surgery.

European Journal of Plastic SurgeryVol. 49(1)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Peripheral Nerve Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.