“Are you sexually active?”: Unilateral informing patterns in communicating the sexual impact of prostate cancer treatment

Prostate cancer treatments can impact couples' sex lives; accordingly, the sexual impact of treatment is an important topic during clinical consultations. This study explores how the sexual impact of treatment is communicated to couples during consultations for people with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. A conversation analysis of diagnostic and treatment consultations examined interactions where sexual impact was discussed. Two sequential patterns were identified, one with the polar question "are you sexually active" and one without. The polar question served as a conversational springboard for clinicians' information deliveries to inform couples of sexual treatment effects without addressing couples' responses. Sequences without the polar question also served to enable delivery of clinical information about sexual treatment effects; although clinicians would sometimes attempt to elicit acknowledgement from patients, clinicians and couples oriented to sexual activity as a taboo topic and there was no opportunity to explore the implications for the couple. In both patterns, talk which sought to inform inhibited couples' contributions. This is the first conversation analytic study to explore how the organisation of talk about the sexual impact of prostate cancer with couples enables and limits exploration of patients' priorities, values and sexual histories. By elucidating why lifeworld concerns around sex go unaddressed, this study offers insight into interactional barriers to shared decision-making about treatments. Further research to identify the range of conversational practices to facilitate exploration of patients' values about sex in prostate cancer consultations is essential to offer an evidence base to develop clinical communication skills training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119528
Primary Topic
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Are you sexually active?”: Unilateral informing patterns in communicating the sexual impact of prostate cancer treatment

Lisa Roberts, Simon John Stewart, Lucy Brindle
Social Science & Medicine
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
article

“Are you sexually active?”: Unilateral informing patterns in communicating the sexual impact of prostate cancer treatment

Lisa Roberts, Simon John Stewart, Lucy Brindle
article en

Abstract

Prostate cancer treatments can impact couples' sex lives; accordingly, the sexual impact of treatment is an important topic during clinical consultations. This study explores how the sexual impact of treatment is communicated to couples during consultations for people with low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. A conversation analysis of diagnostic and treatment consultations examined interactions where sexual impact was discussed. Two sequential patterns were identified, one with the polar question "are you sexually active" and one without. The polar question served as a conversational springboard for clinicians' information deliveries to inform couples of sexual treatment effects without addressing couples' responses. Sequences without the polar question also served to enable delivery of clinical information about sexual treatment effects; although clinicians would sometimes attempt to elicit acknowledgement from patients, clinicians and couples oriented to sexual activity as a taboo topic and there was no opportunity to explore the implications for the couple. In both patterns, talk which sought to inform inhibited couples' contributions. This is the first conversation analytic study to explore how the organisation of talk about the sexual impact of prostate cancer with couples enables and limits exploration of patients' priorities, values and sexual histories. By elucidating why lifeworld concerns around sex go unaddressed, this study offers insight into interactional barriers to shared decision-making about treatments. Further research to identify the range of conversational practices to facilitate exploration of patients' values about sex in prostate cancer consultations is essential to offer an evidence base to develop clinical communication skills training.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 404
University of Staffordshire (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Movember Foundation, Prostate Cancer UK, Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sex and Gender in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.