Long‐term efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate: Open‐label extension of a randomized, placebo‐controlled study in a multinational Asian population

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in an open-label extension (OLE) of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study (NCT04557085; YKP3089C035 [Study C035]) in Asian patients with uncontrolled focal seizures. METHODS: Patients 18-70 years old with uncontrolled focal seizures despite treatment with 1-3 antiseizure medications who completed the 24-week double-blind treatment period (n = 425) at cenobamate doses of 100, 200, or 400 mg/day or placebo could enter a 52-week OLE. All patients were converted to a cenobamate dose of 400 mg/day during a 20-week double-blind conversion phase and then entered a 32-week open-label maintenance phase at a starting dose of 300 mg/day. RESULTS: Among the 410 patients who entered the double-blind conversion phase, 357 (263 and 94 originally randomized to cenobamate and placebo, respectively) entered the OLE maintenance phase. The median percent focal seizure frequency reduction from double-blind baseline for patients who received at least one dose of cenobamate during the 32-week maintenance phase was 83.6%. The percent of patients achieving ≥50% and 100% responses during the maintenance phase was 75.1% and 25.5%, respectively. Among patients entering the OLE, 84.6% (347/410) completed the 52 weeks of treatment with cenobamate. The most commonly occurring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the entire OLE were dizziness, somnolence, γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase, and COVID-19 infection. GGT increase was not associated with any clinically significant findings. Serious TEAEs occurred in 11.7% of patients (48/410). There were no deaths and no cases of DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome reported. SIGNIFICANCE: The high long-term seizure frequency reductions, including a 100% responder rate of 25.5%, were consistent with previous long-term cenobamate efficacy. The OLE safety profile was also generally consistent with the known cenobamate safety profile, with no new safety signals identified. These results support the use of cenobamate in adult Asian patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epilepsia
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/epi.70459
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long‐term efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate: Open‐label extension of a randomized, placebo‐controlled study in a multinational Asian population

Sunita N. Misra, Takamichi Yamamoto, Myung Won Kim, William E. Rosenfeld et al.
Epilepsia
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Long‐term efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate: Open‐label extension of a randomized, placebo‐controlled study in a multinational Asian population

Sunita N. Misra, Takamichi Yamamoto, Myung Won Kim, William E. Rosenfeld, Marc Kamin, Jungshin Park, Seung Bong Hong, Dong Chi Zhou, Suiqiang Zhu, Kyoung Heo, Ji Hyun Kim, Xiao‐Rong Liu, Kensuke Kawai, Zhen Hong, Sang Kun Lee, Paul N. Yu, Yong Heui Jeon, Koji Iida, Eunyeong Choe, Louis Ferrari, Jiwon Jung
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive cenobamate in an open-label extension (OLE) of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study (NCT04557085; YKP3089C035 [Study C035]) in Asian patients with uncontrolled focal seizures. METHODS: Patients 18-70 years old with uncontrolled focal seizures despite treatment with 1-3 antiseizure medications who completed the 24-week double-blind treatment period (n = 425) at cenobamate doses of 100, 200, or 400 mg/day or placebo could enter a 52-week OLE. All patients were converted to a cenobamate dose of 400 mg/day during a 20-week double-blind conversion phase and then entered a 32-week open-label maintenance phase at a starting dose of 300 mg/day. RESULTS: Among the 410 patients who entered the double-blind conversion phase, 357 (263 and 94 originally randomized to cenobamate and placebo, respectively) entered the OLE maintenance phase. The median percent focal seizure frequency reduction from double-blind baseline for patients who received at least one dose of cenobamate during the 32-week maintenance phase was 83.6%. The percent of patients achieving ≥50% and 100% responses during the maintenance phase was 75.1% and 25.5%, respectively. Among patients entering the OLE, 84.6% (347/410) completed the 52 weeks of treatment with cenobamate. The most commonly occurring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during the entire OLE were dizziness, somnolence, γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) increase, and COVID-19 infection. GGT increase was not associated with any clinically significant findings. Serious TEAEs occurred in 11.7% of patients (48/410). There were no deaths and no cases of DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome reported. SIGNIFICANCE: The high long-term seizure frequency reductions, including a 100% responder rate of 25.5%, were consistent with previous long-term cenobamate efficacy. The OLE safety profile was also generally consistent with the known cenobamate safety profile, with no new safety signals identified. These results support the use of cenobamate in adult Asian patients with uncontrolled focal seizures.

Epilepsia
Jichi Medical University (JP), Yonsei University (KR), Sichuan University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Korea University Medical Center (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Hanall Biopharma (South Korea) (KR), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN), Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital (JP), Center for Children (US), SK Life Science (United States) (US), Hiroshima University Hospital (JP), Huashan Hospital (CN), Tongji Hospital (CN), Korea University (JP), Seoul Sleep Center (KR), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
SK Life Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.