Comparative Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Alternative Marine Fuels in Traffic Separation Schemes Using Monte Carlo Simulation

The transition towards low-carbon shipping has accelerated the adoption of alternative marine fuels such as ammonia, hydrogen, methanol and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Although these fuels reduce greenhouse gas emissions, they introduce new operational hazards related to toxicity, flammability, cryogenic storage and explosion risk. Existing comparative assessments are predominantly deterministic, representing accident probability and consequence severity by single values while neglecting operational uncertainty. This study proposes a probabilistic consequence-weighted risk assessment framework for alternative marine fuels operating within high-density Traffic Separation Schemes (TSSs). The methodology integrates historical traffic data, a location-specific contextual vulnerability multiplier and fuel-specific accident characteristics, propagating uncertainty through Monte Carlo simulation using Beta distributions for conditional loss-of-containment probability and triangular distributions for consequence severity. One million simulations per fuel-location combination were adopted after numerical convergence checks. The framework was applied to three Spanish TSSs (Tarifa, Cabo de Gata and Finisterre) and four candidate fuels (ammonia, hydrogen, methanol and LNG). Unlike deterministic approaches, the methodology provides complete risk distributions, P5–P95 uncertainty intervals and probabilistic fuel rankings. Results show that geographical location materially modifies operational risk and must be considered jointly with fuel-specific hazard; within the adopted scenario matrix, Tarifa remains the most critical location. Ammonia consistently exhibits the highest consequence-weighted risk. The framework is intended as a transparent comparative screening and decision-support tool rather than as a substitute for an absolute quantitative risk assessment based on physical consequence endpoints and observed accident frequencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14171591
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Alternative Marine Fuels in Traffic Separation Schemes Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Francisco Javier Pérez Castelo, José A. Orosa, Manuel Vázquez Neira, Candela Maceiras Tajes
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Comparative Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Alternative Marine Fuels in Traffic Separation Schemes Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Francisco Javier Pérez Castelo, José A. Orosa, Manuel Vázquez Neira, Candela Maceiras Tajes
article en

Abstract

The transition towards low-carbon shipping has accelerated the adoption of alternative marine fuels such as ammonia, hydrogen, methanol and liquefied natural gas (LNG). Although these fuels reduce greenhouse gas emissions, they introduce new operational hazards related to toxicity, flammability, cryogenic storage and explosion risk. Existing comparative assessments are predominantly deterministic, representing accident probability and consequence severity by single values while neglecting operational uncertainty. This study proposes a probabilistic consequence-weighted risk assessment framework for alternative marine fuels operating within high-density Traffic Separation Schemes (TSSs). The methodology integrates historical traffic data, a location-specific contextual vulnerability multiplier and fuel-specific accident characteristics, propagating uncertainty through Monte Carlo simulation using Beta distributions for conditional loss-of-containment probability and triangular distributions for consequence severity. One million simulations per fuel-location combination were adopted after numerical convergence checks. The framework was applied to three Spanish TSSs (Tarifa, Cabo de Gata and Finisterre) and four candidate fuels (ammonia, hydrogen, methanol and LNG). Unlike deterministic approaches, the methodology provides complete risk distributions, P5–P95 uncertainty intervals and probabilistic fuel rankings. Results show that geographical location materially modifies operational risk and must be considered jointly with fuel-specific hazard; within the adopted scenario matrix, Tarifa remains the most critical location. Ammonia consistently exhibits the highest consequence-weighted risk. The framework is intended as a transparent comparative screening and decision-support tool rather than as a substitute for an absolute quantitative risk assessment based on physical consequence endpoints and observed accident frequencies.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 14(17)
Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.