Severity of Reactions in Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges: New Insights From the EuroPrevall Outpatient Clinic Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral food challenge, particularly double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), is the gold standard for diagnosis of food allergy, although safety concerns limit its widespread use. Objectives: To evaluate the severity of reactions during DBPCFCs and to identify predictors of severe reactions. METHODS: DBPCFCs from the EuroPrevall outpatient clinic study were analyzed in patients reporting immediate reactions to milk, egg, fish, shrimp, peanut, hazelnut, celeriac, apple, and/or peach. Patients with prior life-threatening anaphylaxis were excluded. Reaction severity (patient-reported and DBPCFC-elicited) was assessed using the Food Allergy Severity Score. A 2-step modeling strategy based on generalized estimating equations was applied to identify predictors of a positive DBPCFC, and, among positive challenges, predictors of anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Among 514 DBPCFCs performed, 190 (36.9%) were negative, 30 (5.8%) uncertain, and 294 (57.2%) positive (102 mild oropharyngeal reactions [19.8%] and 192 systemic reactions [37.4%], of which 160 were moderate and 32 severe). The 32 severe reactions comprised 30 cases (30/514 [5.8%]) with lower respiratory involvement (16/30 with cough or dyspnea) and 2 anaphylaxis with hypotension (2/514 [0.4%]). DBPCFC reactions were less severe than patient-reported reactions (P<.01). Atopic dermatitis and food-specific IgE >0.35 kUA/L predicted positivity, whereas prior reaction severity and egg challenge were predictors of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: While systemic reactions during DBPCFCs were frequent, severe anaphylaxis was rare, supporting the safety profile of DBPCFCs when appropriately conducted. Key predictors of reactivity include atopic dermatitis and food-specific sensitization, while prior severity points to a risk of anaphylaxis. These findings may help risk stratification and patient selection in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18176/jiaci.1217
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Severity of Reactions in Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges: New Insights From the EuroPrevall Outpatient Clinic Study

Laura Barreales, Todor A. Popov, Monika Jędrzejczak-Czechowicz, A Gonzalo-Fernández et al.
Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Severity of Reactions in Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenges: New Insights From the EuroPrevall Outpatient Clinic Study

Laura Barreales, Todor A. Popov, Monika Jędrzejczak-Czechowicz, A Gonzalo-Fernández, Rosialzira Natasha Vera-Berrios, Ashok Purohit, Simona Bělohlávková, Barbara Ballmer‐Weber, Michael Clausen, EN Clare Mills, Isabel Reig, Náyade del Prado, Thuy-My Le, Ronald van Ree, Frédéric de Blay, Nikolaos G Papadopoulos, Athanasios Sinaniotis, Montserrat Fernández-Rivas, Riccardo Asero, André C Knulst
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral food challenge, particularly double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), is the gold standard for diagnosis of food allergy, although safety concerns limit its widespread use. Objectives: To evaluate the severity of reactions during DBPCFCs and to identify predictors of severe reactions. METHODS: DBPCFCs from the EuroPrevall outpatient clinic study were analyzed in patients reporting immediate reactions to milk, egg, fish, shrimp, peanut, hazelnut, celeriac, apple, and/or peach. Patients with prior life-threatening anaphylaxis were excluded. Reaction severity (patient-reported and DBPCFC-elicited) was assessed using the Food Allergy Severity Score. A 2-step modeling strategy based on generalized estimating equations was applied to identify predictors of a positive DBPCFC, and, among positive challenges, predictors of anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Among 514 DBPCFCs performed, 190 (36.9%) were negative, 30 (5.8%) uncertain, and 294 (57.2%) positive (102 mild oropharyngeal reactions [19.8%] and 192 systemic reactions [37.4%], of which 160 were moderate and 32 severe). The 32 severe reactions comprised 30 cases (30/514 [5.8%]) with lower respiratory involvement (16/30 with cough or dyspnea) and 2 anaphylaxis with hypotension (2/514 [0.4%]). DBPCFC reactions were less severe than patient-reported reactions (P<.01). Atopic dermatitis and food-specific IgE >0.35 kUA/L predicted positivity, whereas prior reaction severity and egg challenge were predictors of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: While systemic reactions during DBPCFCs were frequent, severe anaphylaxis was rare, supporting the safety profile of DBPCFCs when appropriately conducted. Key predictors of reactivity include atopic dermatitis and food-specific sensitization, while prior severity points to a risk of anaphylaxis. These findings may help risk stratification and patient selection in clinical practice.

Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical ImmunologyVol. 37(6)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Reykjavík University (IS), Utrecht University (NL), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Ospedale San Carlo (IT), University Hospital St. Ivan Rilski (BG), National University Hospital of Iceland (IS), Medical University of Lodz (PL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.