Older patients’ experiences of treatment decision-making for palliative radiotherapy: a qualitative interview study”

PURPOSE: In Sweden, thousands of older adults undergo radiotherapy each year with either curative or palliative intent. Palliative radiotherapy aims to relieve symptoms while minimising treatment burden and maintaining quality of life. Treatment decision-making can be challenging, as symptom relief, treatment burden, and personal priorities must be balanced. Older cancer patients may face barriers, including frailty, emotional distress, and limited medical literacy, which may affect participation in decision-making. This study explored older cancer patients' experiences of treatment decision-making regarding palliative radiotherapy. METHODS: An inductive qualitative descriptive design was employed. Seventeen cancer patients aged 70 years or older receiving palliative radiotherapy at three radiotherapy units in Sweden participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants' experiences were shaped by acceptance of mortality, hope, trust in healthcare professionals, and perceived opportunities for participation. While some described communication and professional guidance that facilitated involvement, others viewed treatment decisions as largely predetermined. Trust in healthcare professionals was often experienced as a valued form of delegated decision-making but could coexist with limited autonomy. Continuity of care, clear communication, and being recognised as a whole person were central to feeling supported throughout the decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS: Participation depended not only on being offered choices but also on communication, shared understanding, timing, continuity of care, and relational support. Strengthening these aspects of care may facilitate more meaningful involvement in decisions regarding palliative radiotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2026.103307
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Older patients’ experiences of treatment decision-making for palliative radiotherapy: a qualitative interview study”

Emma Ohlsson‐Nevo, Per Fransson, Sofia Axelsson, Per Fessé
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Older patients’ experiences of treatment decision-making for palliative radiotherapy: a qualitative interview study”

Emma Ohlsson‐Nevo, Per Fransson, Sofia Axelsson, Per Fessé
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: In Sweden, thousands of older adults undergo radiotherapy each year with either curative or palliative intent. Palliative radiotherapy aims to relieve symptoms while minimising treatment burden and maintaining quality of life. Treatment decision-making can be challenging, as symptom relief, treatment burden, and personal priorities must be balanced. Older cancer patients may face barriers, including frailty, emotional distress, and limited medical literacy, which may affect participation in decision-making. This study explored older cancer patients' experiences of treatment decision-making regarding palliative radiotherapy. METHODS: An inductive qualitative descriptive design was employed. Seventeen cancer patients aged 70 years or older receiving palliative radiotherapy at three radiotherapy units in Sweden participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants' experiences were shaped by acceptance of mortality, hope, trust in healthcare professionals, and perceived opportunities for participation. While some described communication and professional guidance that facilitated involvement, others viewed treatment decisions as largely predetermined. Trust in healthcare professionals was often experienced as a valued form of delegated decision-making but could coexist with limited autonomy. Continuity of care, clear communication, and being recognised as a whole person were central to feeling supported throughout the decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS: Participation depended not only on being offered choices but also on communication, shared understanding, timing, continuity of care, and relational support. Strengthening these aspects of care may facilitate more meaningful involvement in decisions regarding palliative radiotherapy.

European Journal of Oncology NursingVol. 84
Örebro University (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.