Woven endobridge device compared to stent-assisted coiling and microsurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms

Background: Endovascular techniques and devices, including Woven EndoBridge (WEB) and stent-assisted coiling (SAC), expand the choice of therapies for complex aneurysms, while the evidence directly comparing them to microsurgical clipping (MSC) remains very limited. This meta-analysis compares the safety and efficacy of WEB vs SAC and MSC in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods: This study followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified comparative cohort studies of WEB vs SAC and MSC for wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Outcomes included occlusion, favorable functional/neurological outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2, complications, and mortality. Statistical analyses were performed in R Studio. Heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 and leave-one-out (LOO) sensitivity, and publication bias with funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: Seventeen observational studies with a total of 2289 patients were included. When compared with mechanical circulatory support (MSC), the WEB device was associated with lower rates of adequate occlusion (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69–0.86; P < .001) and higher rates of incomplete occlusion (RR 4.61; 95% CI 2.12–10.01; P < .001). No significant differences were found in mortality or favorable neurological outcomes (defined as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2). In comparisons with stent-assisted coiling (SAC), the WEB device showed similar rates of complete occlusion (RR 0.98; P = .617), retreatment (RR 0.79; P = .508), and thromboembolic complications (RR 0.59; P = .137). The WEB device did demonstrate a significantly lower incidence of procedure-related complications (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29–0.85; P = .011). Conclusion: MSC offers the most durable occlusion, whereas WEB and SAC are less invasive, with WEB showing better safety than SAC but lower durability than MSC, supporting individualized, evidence-based treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000050462
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Woven endobridge device compared to stent-assisted coiling and microsurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms

Filipe Virgílio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Adil Ahmed, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves et al.
Medicine
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

Woven endobridge device compared to stent-assisted coiling and microsurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms

Filipe Virgílio Ribeiro, Kenzo Ogasawara Donato, Adil Ahmed, Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves, José Fernando Olvera-Castro, Syed Sarmad Bukhari, Muhammad Nawaz Khan, Anderson Matheus Pereira da Silva, Maria Antonia Oliveira Machado Pereira, João Vitor Andrade Fernandes, Paweł Łajczak
article en

Abstract

Background: Endovascular techniques and devices, including Woven EndoBridge (WEB) and stent-assisted coiling (SAC), expand the choice of therapies for complex aneurysms, while the evidence directly comparing them to microsurgical clipping (MSC) remains very limited. This meta-analysis compares the safety and efficacy of WEB vs SAC and MSC in patients with ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Methods: This study followed PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified comparative cohort studies of WEB vs SAC and MSC for wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. Outcomes included occlusion, favorable functional/neurological outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2, complications, and mortality. Statistical analyses were performed in R Studio. Heterogeneity was assessed with I 2 and leave-one-out (LOO) sensitivity, and publication bias with funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: Seventeen observational studies with a total of 2289 patients were included. When compared with mechanical circulatory support (MSC), the WEB device was associated with lower rates of adequate occlusion (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69–0.86; P < .001) and higher rates of incomplete occlusion (RR 4.61; 95% CI 2.12–10.01; P < .001). No significant differences were found in mortality or favorable neurological outcomes (defined as modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–2). In comparisons with stent-assisted coiling (SAC), the WEB device showed similar rates of complete occlusion (RR 0.98; P = .617), retreatment (RR 0.79; P = .508), and thromboembolic complications (RR 0.59; P = .137). The WEB device did demonstrate a significantly lower incidence of procedure-related complications (RR 0.49; 95% CI 0.29–0.85; P = .011). Conclusion: MSC offers the most durable occlusion, whereas WEB and SAC are less invasive, with WEB showing better safety than SAC but lower durability than MSC, supporting individualized, evidence-based treatment.

MedicineVol. 105(35)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (BR), Harvard University (US), Medical University of Silesia (PL), Universidade Federal da Paraíba (BR), Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (MX), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Lady Reading Hospital (PK), Universidade Federal do Piauí (BR), Universidade Estadual do Piauí (BR), Centro Universitário Barão de Mauá (BR), Fundação Bahiana de Infectologia (BR), Northwest General Hospital and Research Center (PK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.