Tracing learner responsiveness through temporal interaction patterns

Educational AI systems increasingly seek to personalize support by tracking how learners interact with feedback and instructional events. However, many current systems emphasize activity quantity over learners’ responsiveness to pedagogical timing. This study models behavioural responsiveness, operationalized as learner clicks occurring within 24 h of machine-generated events, using log data from 10,452 learners in a large-scale online platform. We introduce novel temporal features, including burstiness, entropy, and the Human–Machine Collaboration Index (HMCI), a metric of behavioural synchrony between learner activity and system events. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and neural networks) classified course withdrawal and behavioural responsiveness with high internal accuracy and interpretability (e.g., SHAP analysis). Importantly, these models are not intended for real-time prediction but rather to evaluate the coherence of a behavioural proxy. Findings suggest that modelling temporal alignment, rather than raw engagement, offers a promising direction for designing responsive, interpretable educational technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-01917-6
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing learner responsiveness through temporal interaction patterns

Meihua Qian, Patrick O. Akinwumi, Oyinkansola A. Babatope
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Tracing learner responsiveness through temporal interaction patterns

Meihua Qian, Patrick O. Akinwumi, Oyinkansola A. Babatope
article en

Abstract

Educational AI systems increasingly seek to personalize support by tracking how learners interact with feedback and instructional events. However, many current systems emphasize activity quantity over learners’ responsiveness to pedagogical timing. This study models behavioural responsiveness, operationalized as learner clicks occurring within 24 h of machine-generated events, using log data from 10,452 learners in a large-scale online platform. We introduce novel temporal features, including burstiness, entropy, and the Human–Machine Collaboration Index (HMCI), a metric of behavioural synchrony between learner activity and system events. Four machine learning models (logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, and neural networks) classified course withdrawal and behavioural responsiveness with high internal accuracy and interpretability (e.g., SHAP analysis). Importantly, these models are not intended for real-time prediction but rather to evaluate the coherence of a behavioural proxy. Findings suggest that modelling temporal alignment, rather than raw engagement, offers a promising direction for designing responsive, interpretable educational technologies.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6(1)
Clemson University (US), Bournemouth University (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.