Neural Correlates of Uncertainty Processing During Decision-Making in Individuals with Different Levels of Worry Proneness

Background: Worry proneness has been proposed to influence uncertainty processing; however, its neural mechanisms during different forms of uncertain decision-making remain poorly understood. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate behavioral and neural responses associated with risky and ambiguous decision-making and to examine how individual differences in worry proneness relate to uncertainty-related neural processing. Methods: Participants completed a modified ambiguity–risk decision-making task during fMRI scanning. Whole-brain, region-of-interest (ROI), and continuous PSWQ-based correlation analyses were conducted to characterize neural responses associated with uncertainty type and individual differences in worry proneness. Results: Behavioral analyses revealed no significant effects of worry proneness or uncertainty type on gambling choices or reaction times. Whole-brain analyses showed that risky decisions elicited greater activation than ambiguous decisions in the right insula, right inferior parietal lobule, and left supramarginal gyrus, whereas ambiguous decisions preferentially recruited the right superior temporal gyrus. An exploratory peak-level interaction between worry proneness and uncertainty type was identified in the right middle frontal gyrus (BA6), with higher worry proneness associated with lower BA6 activation during risky decision-making. Continuous analyses further showed that BA6 activation during risky decisions was negatively correlated with PSWQ scores. ROI analyses demonstrated greater activation during risky than ambiguous decisions in the bilateral caudate nucleus, left insula, and right inferior frontal gyrus. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that risky and ambiguous decision-making are associated with partially dissociable patterns of neural activation. Worry proneness was not associated with widespread alterations in behavioral performance or uncertainty-related neural responses; however, exploratory analyses identified localized associations between worry proneness and prefrontal neural responses during risky decision-making. These findings suggest that individual differences in worry proneness may be related to selective variation in specific neural processes rather than broad alterations in the neural systems supporting uncertainty processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Sciences
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16091518
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural Correlates of Uncertainty Processing During Decision-Making in Individuals with Different Levels of Worry Proneness

Xueli Cai, Mengxue Wu, Rui Yang, Hong Tang et al.
Behavioral Sciences
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Neural Correlates of Uncertainty Processing During Decision-Making in Individuals with Different Levels of Worry Proneness

Xueli Cai, Mengxue Wu, Rui Yang, Hong Tang, Ju Fan
article en

Abstract

Background: Worry proneness has been proposed to influence uncertainty processing; however, its neural mechanisms during different forms of uncertain decision-making remain poorly understood. This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate behavioral and neural responses associated with risky and ambiguous decision-making and to examine how individual differences in worry proneness relate to uncertainty-related neural processing. Methods: Participants completed a modified ambiguity–risk decision-making task during fMRI scanning. Whole-brain, region-of-interest (ROI), and continuous PSWQ-based correlation analyses were conducted to characterize neural responses associated with uncertainty type and individual differences in worry proneness. Results: Behavioral analyses revealed no significant effects of worry proneness or uncertainty type on gambling choices or reaction times. Whole-brain analyses showed that risky decisions elicited greater activation than ambiguous decisions in the right insula, right inferior parietal lobule, and left supramarginal gyrus, whereas ambiguous decisions preferentially recruited the right superior temporal gyrus. An exploratory peak-level interaction between worry proneness and uncertainty type was identified in the right middle frontal gyrus (BA6), with higher worry proneness associated with lower BA6 activation during risky decision-making. Continuous analyses further showed that BA6 activation during risky decisions was negatively correlated with PSWQ scores. ROI analyses demonstrated greater activation during risky than ambiguous decisions in the bilateral caudate nucleus, left insula, and right inferior frontal gyrus. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that risky and ambiguous decision-making are associated with partially dissociable patterns of neural activation. Worry proneness was not associated with widespread alterations in behavioral performance or uncertainty-related neural responses; however, exploratory analyses identified localized associations between worry proneness and prefrontal neural responses during risky decision-making. These findings suggest that individual differences in worry proneness may be related to selective variation in specific neural processes rather than broad alterations in the neural systems supporting uncertainty processing.

Behavioral SciencesVol. 16(9)
Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.