Artificial Versus Magneto-Aerotactic Bacterial Robots for Cancer Therapy

The use of magnetotactic bacteria (MTB), proposed by the author about 25 years ago, allowed the implementation of embedded capabilities allowing the execution of specific complex tasks such as the target delivery of therapeutics in tumoral hypoxic zones that could not be implemented in artificial micro/nanorobots due to technological limitations at such a small scale. Since then, technology has evolved but the question remains about how long such superior advantage of using only certain types of live microorganisms will last before embedding such capabilities in artificial micro/nanorobots becomes feasible while being a viable alternative. Although it is difficult to answer this question, this paper aims to provide clues with a perspective view about the challenges of implementing an artificial or synthetic counterpart by providing a general description of an equivalent artificial implementation of the embedded functional units found in such magneto-aerotactic bacterial robots for cancer therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Micromachines
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi17091026
Primary Topic
Cancer Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Artificial Versus Magneto-Aerotactic Bacterial Robots for Cancer Therapy

Sylvain Martel
Micromachines
Cancer Research and Treatments
article

Artificial Versus Magneto-Aerotactic Bacterial Robots for Cancer Therapy

Sylvain Martel
article en

Abstract

The use of magnetotactic bacteria (MTB), proposed by the author about 25 years ago, allowed the implementation of embedded capabilities allowing the execution of specific complex tasks such as the target delivery of therapeutics in tumoral hypoxic zones that could not be implemented in artificial micro/nanorobots due to technological limitations at such a small scale. Since then, technology has evolved but the question remains about how long such superior advantage of using only certain types of live microorganisms will last before embedding such capabilities in artificial micro/nanorobots becomes feasible while being a viable alternative. Although it is difficult to answer this question, this paper aims to provide clues with a perspective view about the challenges of implementing an artificial or synthetic counterpart by providing a general description of an equivalent artificial implementation of the embedded functional units found in such magneto-aerotactic bacterial robots for cancer therapy.

MicromachinesVol. 17(9)
Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cancer Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.