Evaluating Variations of Feeder Attention in Mitigating the Side Effects of Escape Extinction

Research has shown that removing bites is the primary motivator for children with feeding difficulties to engage in inappropriate mealtime behavior (IMB) and escape extinction (EE) is the most well-established treatment component. Escape extinction may result in temporary but negative side effects (e.g., increases in crying). Attention from the feeder is another common motivator but less is known regarding the impact or efficacy of different applications of feeder attention, including attention extinction, noncontingent attention, or differential reinforcement of alternative behavior with attention. The current study included six participants and is the first to directly compare the efficacy and caregiver acceptability of EE with different schedules of feeder attention in isolation. All treatment packages resulted in reductions in IMB and increased consumption of new foods. Overall, results indicated that different schedules of feeder attention may mitigate negative side effects of EE and that caregivers prefer a treatment that includes feeder attention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Modification
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455261474797
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Variations of Feeder Attention in Mitigating the Side Effects of Escape Extinction

Jennifer M. Kozisek, Amy K. Drayton, Tina Vo, Nicole C. Demchuk et al.
Behavior Modification
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
article

Evaluating Variations of Feeder Attention in Mitigating the Side Effects of Escape Extinction

Jennifer M. Kozisek, Amy K. Drayton, Tina Vo, Nicole C. Demchuk, Bethany Hansen, Angelica Ibarra, Ilissa V. Frye, Daniel M. Shriver
article en

Abstract

Research has shown that removing bites is the primary motivator for children with feeding difficulties to engage in inappropriate mealtime behavior (IMB) and escape extinction (EE) is the most well-established treatment component. Escape extinction may result in temporary but negative side effects (e.g., increases in crying). Attention from the feeder is another common motivator but less is known regarding the impact or efficacy of different applications of feeder attention, including attention extinction, noncontingent attention, or differential reinforcement of alternative behavior with attention. The current study included six participants and is the first to directly compare the efficacy and caregiver acceptability of EE with different schedules of feeder attention in isolation. All treatment packages resulted in reductions in IMB and increased consumption of new foods. Overall, results indicated that different schedules of feeder attention may mitigate negative side effects of EE and that caregivers prefer a treatment that includes feeder attention.

Behavior Modification
Nebraska Medical Center (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Child Health Research Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Variations of Feeder Attention in Mitigating the Side Effects of Escape Extinction — Jennifer M. Kozisek, Amy K. Drayton, et al. · Behavior Modification (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS