A prospective observational study to evaluate the prevalence of severe asthma among subjects with difficult-to-treat asthma at a tertiary care center in North India

Background: Severe asthma accounts for disproportionate asthma-related morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs, yet prospective data on its prevalence remain limited, particularly for developing countries. We aimed to determine the prevalence of severe asthma among subjects with difficult-to-treat asthma at a tertiary care center in North India. Methods: Between January and December 2023, we prospectively enrolled consecutive adults with difficult-to-treat asthma that remained uncontrolled despite treatment with medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids-long-acting beta-agonist (ICS-LABA) or required high-dose ICS-LABA to maintain good control. All subjects underwent systematic evaluation, including diagnosis confirmation, assessment of inhaler technique and adherence, comorbidity screening, and treatment optimization, with reassessment after 3–6 months. We diagnosed severe asthma (uncontrolled despite high-dose ICS-LABA or required high-dose ICS-LABA to maintain good control) after addressing all modifiable factors and assessed type 2 (T2)-targeted biological therapy eligibility. Results: Among 240 subjects (mean age 47.4 ± 14.9 years; 68.8% female), we identified modifiable factors in 218 (90.8%), including suboptimal therapy (74.2%), poor adherence (64.2%), and incorrect technique (58.8%). Following interventions, 154 completed reassessment; 102 (66.2%) no longer met severe asthma criteria. Overall, 67 subjects had severe asthma (27.9%; 95% CI: 22.4-33.9%). Among them, 66.7% had blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/µL, and 68.7% met criteria for T2-targeted biological therapy. Conclusion: Approximately one-quarter of subjects with difficult-to-treat asthma have confirmed severe asthma after systematic assessment. A significant proportion improve with targeted interventions, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive evaluation. Most patients with confirmed severe asthma are candidates for T2-targeted biologicals, highlighting the need for structured assessment protocols and improved access to biological therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lung India
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_751_25
Primary Topic
Asthma and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prospective observational study to evaluate the prevalence of severe asthma among subjects with difficult-to-treat asthma at a tertiary care center in North India

Yashwant Kumar, Sandeep Sharma, Nidhi Prabhakar, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad et al.
Lung India
Asthma and respiratory diseases
article

A prospective observational study to evaluate the prevalence of severe asthma among subjects with difficult-to-treat asthma at a tertiary care center in North India

Yashwant Kumar, Sandeep Sharma, Nidhi Prabhakar, Kuruswamy Thurai Prasad, Valliappan Muthu, Ashutosh N. Aggarwal, Ritesh Agarwal, Shivaprakash M. Rudramurthy, Sahajal Dhooria, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal
article en

Abstract

Background: Severe asthma accounts for disproportionate asthma-related morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs, yet prospective data on its prevalence remain limited, particularly for developing countries. We aimed to determine the prevalence of severe asthma among subjects with difficult-to-treat asthma at a tertiary care center in North India. Methods: Between January and December 2023, we prospectively enrolled consecutive adults with difficult-to-treat asthma that remained uncontrolled despite treatment with medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids-long-acting beta-agonist (ICS-LABA) or required high-dose ICS-LABA to maintain good control. All subjects underwent systematic evaluation, including diagnosis confirmation, assessment of inhaler technique and adherence, comorbidity screening, and treatment optimization, with reassessment after 3–6 months. We diagnosed severe asthma (uncontrolled despite high-dose ICS-LABA or required high-dose ICS-LABA to maintain good control) after addressing all modifiable factors and assessed type 2 (T2)-targeted biological therapy eligibility. Results: Among 240 subjects (mean age 47.4 ± 14.9 years; 68.8% female), we identified modifiable factors in 218 (90.8%), including suboptimal therapy (74.2%), poor adherence (64.2%), and incorrect technique (58.8%). Following interventions, 154 completed reassessment; 102 (66.2%) no longer met severe asthma criteria. Overall, 67 subjects had severe asthma (27.9%; 95% CI: 22.4-33.9%). Among them, 66.7% had blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/µL, and 68.7% met criteria for T2-targeted biological therapy. Conclusion: Approximately one-quarter of subjects with difficult-to-treat asthma have confirmed severe asthma after systematic assessment. A significant proportion improve with targeted interventions, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive evaluation. Most patients with confirmed severe asthma are candidates for T2-targeted biologicals, highlighting the need for structured assessment protocols and improved access to biological therapies.

Lung IndiaVol. 43(5)
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Asthma and respiratory diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.