Effect of welding groove geometry variation on flatness deviation in GMAW joints

Abstract The study analyzed how variations in welding groove geometric parameters (groove angle, root gap, root face) affect joint flatness deviations, maintaining a cross-sectional area tolerance within 2.3% to eliminate boundary condition variations. Welded joints were scanned using an ATOS 5 M blue light scanner to evaluate geometric means and standard deviations. The results fill a literature gap by demonstrating that the root gap is the dominant parameter influencing flatness deviation distributions along the groove, while other parameters showed no significant impact. Quantitatively, the maximum difference in geometric mean flatness deviation reached 23% for the Go6 configuration compared to the reference geometry Go1. High process variability was observed, with a maximum-to-minimum standard deviation ratio of 8.3 between Go5 and Go2, causing 40% of the expected flatness deviation results for Go6 to exceed reference values. Statistical testing (Q crit = 0.941, α = 0.05) rejected no outliers, but highlighted that three repetitions ( n = 3) are insufficient for full process estimation. The empirical dataset, encompassing groove widths from 4.61 to 5.77 mm and centroid positions from 1.67 to 2.03 mm, provides a reliable basis for high-range calibration of FEM numerical models. Moreover, the obtained results provide an important technological reference for the design and fabrication of thin-walled welded enclosures manufactured by single-pass welding for industry applications using high-alloy austenitic steels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Welding in the World
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40194-026-02604-x
Primary Topic
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effect of welding groove geometry variation on flatness deviation in GMAW joints

Damian Grzesiak, Krzysztof Nadolny
Welding in the World
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
article

Effect of welding groove geometry variation on flatness deviation in GMAW joints

Damian Grzesiak, Krzysztof Nadolny
article en

Abstract

Abstract The study analyzed how variations in welding groove geometric parameters (groove angle, root gap, root face) affect joint flatness deviations, maintaining a cross-sectional area tolerance within 2.3% to eliminate boundary condition variations. Welded joints were scanned using an ATOS 5 M blue light scanner to evaluate geometric means and standard deviations. The results fill a literature gap by demonstrating that the root gap is the dominant parameter influencing flatness deviation distributions along the groove, while other parameters showed no significant impact. Quantitatively, the maximum difference in geometric mean flatness deviation reached 23% for the Go6 configuration compared to the reference geometry Go1. High process variability was observed, with a maximum-to-minimum standard deviation ratio of 8.3 between Go5 and Go2, causing 40% of the expected flatness deviation results for Go6 to exceed reference values. Statistical testing (Q crit = 0.941, α = 0.05) rejected no outliers, but highlighted that three repetitions ( n = 3) are insufficient for full process estimation. The empirical dataset, encompassing groove widths from 4.61 to 5.77 mm and centroid positions from 1.67 to 2.03 mm, provides a reliable basis for high-range calibration of FEM numerical models. Moreover, the obtained results provide an important technological reference for the design and fabrication of thin-walled welded enclosures manufactured by single-pass welding for industry applications using high-alloy austenitic steels.

Welding in the World
Koszalin University of Technology (PL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.