Navigating Interprofessional Education: A Qualitative Process Evaluation Examining Leadership Perspectives in Online IPE Curriculum Design and Implementation

INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional education (IPE) remains an important component of curriculum training among health and allied health trainees. Additional research is needed regarding the challenges for facilitators in implementing such educational endeavors. METHOD: Therefore, this qualitative study examined the perspectives of those leading the IPE process and facilitators in planning and implementing an online real-time (synchronous) university-based IPE curriculum. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 7) described the following nine themes that facilitated or challenged the planning and implementation of the IPE curriculum: (1) shared vision and commitment to implementing IPE, (2) emphasizing core competencies in interdisciplinary collaboration, (3) engagement and effort, (4) importance of buy-in, (5) maximizing experiential education, (6) balancing faculty involvement and expectations in IPE development, (7) balancing educational content for diverse experience levels, (8) challenges in staffing continuity for sustaining IPE initiatives, and (9) need for dedicated leadership and resources in IPE implementation. DISCUSSION: These findings explore IPE implementation among a unique constellation of professions that are rarely included in IPE literature and can provide insight for starting, re-evaluating, and improving IPE education and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ceh.0000000000000678
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Interprofessional Education: A Qualitative Process Evaluation Examining Leadership Perspectives in Online IPE Curriculum Design and Implementation

Maria Kleinstäuber, Sara A. Harper, Vicki Simonsmeier, Senyo Agbeyaka
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Navigating Interprofessional Education: A Qualitative Process Evaluation Examining Leadership Perspectives in Online IPE Curriculum Design and Implementation

Maria Kleinstäuber, Sara A. Harper, Vicki Simonsmeier, Senyo Agbeyaka
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Interprofessional education (IPE) remains an important component of curriculum training among health and allied health trainees. Additional research is needed regarding the challenges for facilitators in implementing such educational endeavors. METHOD: Therefore, this qualitative study examined the perspectives of those leading the IPE process and facilitators in planning and implementing an online real-time (synchronous) university-based IPE curriculum. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 7) described the following nine themes that facilitated or challenged the planning and implementation of the IPE curriculum: (1) shared vision and commitment to implementing IPE, (2) emphasizing core competencies in interdisciplinary collaboration, (3) engagement and effort, (4) importance of buy-in, (5) maximizing experiential education, (6) balancing faculty involvement and expectations in IPE development, (7) balancing educational content for diverse experience levels, (8) challenges in staffing continuity for sustaining IPE initiatives, and (9) need for dedicated leadership and resources in IPE implementation. DISCUSSION: These findings explore IPE implementation among a unique constellation of professions that are rarely included in IPE literature and can provide insight for starting, re-evaluating, and improving IPE education and practice.

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Utah State University (US)
Utah State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.