Balancing biodiversity and profitability: pathways to sustainable robusta coffee production in Vietnam’s central highlands

Coffee production in Vietnam’s Central Highlands is important for rural livelihoods and national export earnings, but the sector faces growing pressure from climate variability, declining soil fertility, and biodiversity loss. Intercropping and adjustments in planting density are increasingly promoted as part of diversified coffee-production systems, although their relationships with productivity and farm revenue remain insufficiently understood. This study examined how these management practices were associated with coffee yield, coffee gross revenue, non-coffee gross revenue, and total gross farm revenue in robusta coffee systems. The analysis used 332 farm-year observations from 83 farms in Gia Lai and Lam Dong provinces, collected over four consecutive coffee crop years: 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25. A management-based Biodiversity Practice Index was developed using cropping system and coffee planting density. Farms were classified as Low, Moderate, or High BPI. Descriptive comparisons and adjusted regression models with farm-clustered robust standard errors were used to assess differences across management systems. Low BPI and sole-coffee farms generally recorded the highest coffee yield and coffee gross revenue. Moderate BPI farms recorded the highest total gross farm revenue because revenue from intercrops partly offset lower coffee-derived revenue. After separating coffee and non-coffee revenue, the results did not show a clear BPI advantage for coffee gross revenue alone. Overall, the findings indicate a trade-off between coffee-specialised production and revenue diversification. Intercropping broadened farm revenue sources, but the study does not provide direct evidence of improved ecological biodiversity, sustainability, profitability, or resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Futures
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.102112
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing biodiversity and profitability: pathways to sustainable robusta coffee production in Vietnam’s central highlands

Laurent Bossolasco, Vivekananda M. Byrareddy, Shahbaz Mushtaq, Thanveer Shaik et al.
Sustainable Futures
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Balancing biodiversity and profitability: pathways to sustainable robusta coffee production in Vietnam’s central highlands

Laurent Bossolasco, Vivekananda M. Byrareddy, Shahbaz Mushtaq, Thanveer Shaik, Thanh Mai
article en

Abstract

Coffee production in Vietnam’s Central Highlands is important for rural livelihoods and national export earnings, but the sector faces growing pressure from climate variability, declining soil fertility, and biodiversity loss. Intercropping and adjustments in planting density are increasingly promoted as part of diversified coffee-production systems, although their relationships with productivity and farm revenue remain insufficiently understood. This study examined how these management practices were associated with coffee yield, coffee gross revenue, non-coffee gross revenue, and total gross farm revenue in robusta coffee systems. The analysis used 332 farm-year observations from 83 farms in Gia Lai and Lam Dong provinces, collected over four consecutive coffee crop years: 2021–22, 2022–23, 2023–24, and 2024–25. A management-based Biodiversity Practice Index was developed using cropping system and coffee planting density. Farms were classified as Low, Moderate, or High BPI. Descriptive comparisons and adjusted regression models with farm-clustered robust standard errors were used to assess differences across management systems. Low BPI and sole-coffee farms generally recorded the highest coffee yield and coffee gross revenue. Moderate BPI farms recorded the highest total gross farm revenue because revenue from intercrops partly offset lower coffee-derived revenue. After separating coffee and non-coffee revenue, the results did not show a clear BPI advantage for coffee gross revenue alone. Overall, the findings indicate a trade-off between coffee-specialised production and revenue diversification. Intercropping broadened farm revenue sources, but the study does not provide direct evidence of improved ecological biodiversity, sustainability, profitability, or resilience.

Sustainable FuturesVol. 12
University of Southern Queensland (AU), Anova Corp (Vietnam) (VN)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, KfW Entwicklungsbank
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.