Reflections on Quality in Academic Writing

Abstract As scholars, we engage with quality as writers, readers, and reviewers of academic texts whether we expressly articulate what we mean by quality or not. In this essay, I will discuss aspects of quality in academic writing as both a process and product. First, we invariably employ some notion of what constitutes quality when we evaluate academic writing in peer review and assessment processes and when we make use of others’ writing in our own writing processes. Second, while quality criteria are important and can be useful, we should use them with caution because they might divert our attention from discussing the quality of a piece of work to focusing on the criteria themselves. Third, it is so important that what counts as quality in academic writing is subject to a rich and nuanced debate like any other aspect of academic work. Thus, we need to talk (much more) about quality in academic writing in order to improve our understanding of how we can aspire to produce quality in our own work and writing, as well as how we assess the quality of academic writing in a given text.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Sociology
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2025-0057
Primary Topic
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reflections on Quality in Academic Writing

Journal of Organizational Sociology
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
article

Reflections on Quality in Academic Writing

article en

Abstract

Abstract As scholars, we engage with quality as writers, readers, and reviewers of academic texts whether we expressly articulate what we mean by quality or not. In this essay, I will discuss aspects of quality in academic writing as both a process and product. First, we invariably employ some notion of what constitutes quality when we evaluate academic writing in peer review and assessment processes and when we make use of others’ writing in our own writing processes. Second, while quality criteria are important and can be useful, we should use them with caution because they might divert our attention from discussing the quality of a piece of work to focusing on the criteria themselves. Third, it is so important that what counts as quality in academic writing is subject to a rich and nuanced debate like any other aspect of academic work. Thus, we need to talk (much more) about quality in academic writing in order to improve our understanding of how we can aspire to produce quality in our own work and writing, as well as how we assess the quality of academic writing in a given text.

Journal of Organizational Sociology
Aalborg University (DK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Publishing and Scholarly Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reflections on Quality in Academic Writing · Journal of Organizational Sociology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS