A Biometric‐Algebraic Block Cipher Framework Using Fingerprint Minutiae, Ridge Orientation Fields, and GL(8,GF(2)) Transformations for Dynamic S‐Box Generation

ABSTRACT The security of symmetric‐key block ciphers depends critically on the strength and structural unpredictability of their substitution boxes (S‐boxes). Existing constructions rely on fixed mathematical structures, such as finite field inversion, chaotic maps, or elliptic curves that are entirely independent of the encrypting user's identity, creating a fundamental separation between authentication and encryption layers. This article presents a formally analyzed framework that derives all cryptographic parameters of a block cipher directly and systematically from the five biometric feature classes of a fingerprint image: minutiae points, ridge orientation fields, singular points (cores and deltas), ridge frequency maps, and local block entropy. Each feature class is mapped, through a novel algebraic procedure, to a distinct cipher parameter: (i) minutiae coordinates and angles seed a Fisher‐Yates permutation that whitens the output of the S‐box permutation layer; (ii) the ridge orientation field is binarized and corrected to generate an invertible matrix for the affine diffusion transform; (iii) singular point topology determines the biometric‐adaptive round count ; (iv) the mean ridge frequency selects the irreducible polynomial from a set of four valid polynomials; and (v) the block entropy map calibrates the per‐round diffusion strength parameter . Three multi‐round block encryption algorithms of increasing complexity are built upon this five‐parameter biometric cipher core, evaluated with a full Python reference implementation that reproduces every reported figure. The primary scheme (Algorithm II) achieves a plaintext avalanche effect of and a key sensitivity of (16 rounds, trials), reaching within of the ideal from round 1. The fingerprint S‐boxes exhibit nonlinearity values in the range with mean 103.8, differential uniformity , SAC mean , BIC‐NL average , and algebraic degree 7 on all eight output bits. A critical cross‐user security property is demonstrated: encrypting identical plaintext with an identical conventional key but different fingerprint templates produces ciphertexts whose pairwise Hamming distance averages (range – per trial, – averaged over 30 trials per pair), confirming that the biometric parameter functions as a genuine second key factor. A parameter‐stability experiment under simulated repeated‐acquisition noise (translation, rotation, minutiae dropout and spurious detections) further shows that the coarse, quantized cipher parameters (round count, field polynomial, diffusion strength) remain stable, while the fine‐grained minutiae‐derived permutation does not—a scope limitation discussed openly alongside the reliance on synthetic ISO/IEC 19794‐2‐format templates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Security and Privacy
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/spy2.70247
Primary Topic
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Biometric‐Algebraic Block Cipher Framework Using Fingerprint Minutiae, Ridge Orientation Fields, and GL(8,GF(2)) Transformations for Dynamic S‐Box Generation

Muhammad Waheed Rasheed, Muhammad Amjad
Security and Privacy
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
article

A Biometric‐Algebraic Block Cipher Framework Using Fingerprint Minutiae, Ridge Orientation Fields, and GL(8,GF(2)) Transformations for Dynamic S‐Box Generation

Muhammad Waheed Rasheed, Muhammad Amjad
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The security of symmetric‐key block ciphers depends critically on the strength and structural unpredictability of their substitution boxes (S‐boxes). Existing constructions rely on fixed mathematical structures, such as finite field inversion, chaotic maps, or elliptic curves that are entirely independent of the encrypting user's identity, creating a fundamental separation between authentication and encryption layers. This article presents a formally analyzed framework that derives all cryptographic parameters of a block cipher directly and systematically from the five biometric feature classes of a fingerprint image: minutiae points, ridge orientation fields, singular points (cores and deltas), ridge frequency maps, and local block entropy. Each feature class is mapped, through a novel algebraic procedure, to a distinct cipher parameter: (i) minutiae coordinates and angles seed a Fisher‐Yates permutation that whitens the output of the S‐box permutation layer; (ii) the ridge orientation field is binarized and corrected to generate an invertible matrix for the affine diffusion transform; (iii) singular point topology determines the biometric‐adaptive round count ; (iv) the mean ridge frequency selects the irreducible polynomial from a set of four valid polynomials; and (v) the block entropy map calibrates the per‐round diffusion strength parameter . Three multi‐round block encryption algorithms of increasing complexity are built upon this five‐parameter biometric cipher core, evaluated with a full Python reference implementation that reproduces every reported figure. The primary scheme (Algorithm II) achieves a plaintext avalanche effect of and a key sensitivity of (16 rounds, trials), reaching within of the ideal from round 1. The fingerprint S‐boxes exhibit nonlinearity values in the range with mean 103.8, differential uniformity , SAC mean , BIC‐NL average , and algebraic degree 7 on all eight output bits. A critical cross‐user security property is demonstrated: encrypting identical plaintext with an identical conventional key but different fingerprint templates produces ciphertexts whose pairwise Hamming distance averages (range – per trial, – averaged over 30 trials per pair), confirming that the biometric parameter functions as a genuine second key factor. A parameter‐stability experiment under simulated repeated‐acquisition noise (translation, rotation, minutiae dropout and spurious detections) further shows that the coarse, quantized cipher parameters (round count, field polynomial, diffusion strength) remain stable, while the fine‐grained minutiae‐derived permutation does not—a scope limitation discussed openly alongside the reliance on synthetic ISO/IEC 19794‐2‐format templates.

Security and PrivacyVol. 9(5)
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), Superior University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.