A Paint Library of Plastic Particles (PLoPP): a spectral library, visual key, and machine learning model for paint microplastic identification

The degradation of paint is thought to be a major pathway of microplastics to the environment. However, pollution from paint microplastics is challenging to assess due to a lack of paint-specific spectral libraries and visual keys to aid in the differentiation of paint microplastics from non-paint microplastics. Here we begin to fill this gap is filled by creating a visual key for paint microplastic identification and a spectral library, the Paint Library of Plastic Particles (PLoPP), using attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared micro-spectroscopy (µATR-FTIR). PLoPP includes 263 spectra from 90 paints used in seven sectors (architectural, automotive, consumer, general industrial, marine, road markings, and wood) spanning 15 colors, five appearances (glitter, gloss, matte, pearl, and semi-gloss), and at least 25 polymers, though primarily polyurethane, polyurethane acrylics, and polyvinyl chloride. To assess the accuracy of the library in identifying paint microplastics from other microplastics, a spectral analysis pipeline using a machine learning model was developed to differentiate between pristine paint and non-paint microplastic samples with an overall accuracy of 92%. Using environmental particles from Plymouth, UK, and spectra from Charleston, SC, we verified the utility of these tools. The machine learning model had an accuracy of 55% when differentiating between environmental paint and non-paint microplastics, while the visual key had an average accuracy of 92% for particles. The correlation-based FTIR library searches in OMNIC TM software using PLoPP correctly classified 86% of the environmental particle spectra as paint/non-paint. This research demonstrates the utility of a paint-specific spectral library and visual key to better identify paint microplastics. Further work should identify whether paints can be characterized by sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-026-00222-4
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Paint Library of Plastic Particles (PLoPP): a spectral library, visual key, and machine learning model for paint microplastic identification

Chelsea M. Rochman, Madeleine H. Milne, Ron Rubinovitz, Jacob Ford et al.
Microplastics and Nanoplastics
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

A Paint Library of Plastic Particles (PLoPP): a spectral library, visual key, and machine learning model for paint microplastic identification

Chelsea M. Rochman, Madeleine H. Milne, Ron Rubinovitz, Jacob Ford, Andrew Turner, Zoie T. Diana
article en

Abstract

The degradation of paint is thought to be a major pathway of microplastics to the environment. However, pollution from paint microplastics is challenging to assess due to a lack of paint-specific spectral libraries and visual keys to aid in the differentiation of paint microplastics from non-paint microplastics. Here we begin to fill this gap is filled by creating a visual key for paint microplastic identification and a spectral library, the Paint Library of Plastic Particles (PLoPP), using attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared micro-spectroscopy (µATR-FTIR). PLoPP includes 263 spectra from 90 paints used in seven sectors (architectural, automotive, consumer, general industrial, marine, road markings, and wood) spanning 15 colors, five appearances (glitter, gloss, matte, pearl, and semi-gloss), and at least 25 polymers, though primarily polyurethane, polyurethane acrylics, and polyvinyl chloride. To assess the accuracy of the library in identifying paint microplastics from other microplastics, a spectral analysis pipeline using a machine learning model was developed to differentiate between pristine paint and non-paint microplastic samples with an overall accuracy of 92%. Using environmental particles from Plymouth, UK, and spectra from Charleston, SC, we verified the utility of these tools. The machine learning model had an accuracy of 55% when differentiating between environmental paint and non-paint microplastics, while the visual key had an average accuracy of 92% for particles. The correlation-based FTIR library searches in OMNIC TM software using PLoPP correctly classified 86% of the environmental particle spectra as paint/non-paint. This research demonstrates the utility of a paint-specific spectral library and visual key to better identify paint microplastics. Further work should identify whether paints can be characterized by sector.

Microplastics and Nanoplastics
University of Toronto (CA), Thermo Fisher Scientific (United States) (US), Thermo Fisher Scientific (Israel) (IL), University of Plymouth (GB)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.