A survey among geriatricians on geriatric oncology and geriatric surgical oncology models in Europe

PURPOSE: To provide an up-to-date overview of geriatricians' involvement in oncological and onco-surgical care for older adults across Europe. METHODS: An anonymous 35-item online survey was distributed via (inter)national societies between 10 April and 23 May 2025. The responses were summarized, and associations between comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) outputs, participation in oncological multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, and involvement in treatment decision-making were explored. RESULTS: A total of 2160 responses were received from 37 countries. Further analysis included 395 geriatrician/internal medicine respondents with > 25% survey completion from 34 countries. Of them, 19% reported no formal geriatric oncology model; the most common approaches were referral based on clinical judgment (43%) and a two-step pathway (42%). Frailty screening-guided referral occurred in 63%, with the G8 (50%) and Clinical Frailty Scale (32%) being the most commonly used. Among respondents, 30% reported routine MDT attendance, and 20% reported involvement in treatment decisions. In exploratory analyses, routine MDT participation was associated with active treatment decision-making (aOR 6.01, 95% CI 3.08-11.7), CGA-based recommendations addressing both geriatric domains and oncological treatment (aOR 5.81, 95% CI 3.16-10.7), and positive feedback from oncology/surgery teams (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.96-7.14; all p < 0.001). Only 39% of respondents were involved in inpatient surgical oncology care, with liaison models predominating (37%). CONCLUSION: Geriatric oncology and geriatric surgical oncology remain unevenly implemented across Europe. Standardized pathways, training, and MDT integration may improve equity of care for older adults with cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Geriatric Medicine
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-026-01575-y
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A survey among geriatricians on geriatric oncology and geriatric surgical oncology models in Europe

Siri Rostoft, Alfonso J. Cruz‐Jentoft, David Shipway, Andrea Sebastiano Ciccone et al.
European Geriatric Medicine
Frailty in Older Adults
article

A survey among geriatricians on geriatric oncology and geriatric surgical oncology models in Europe

Siri Rostoft, Alfonso J. Cruz‐Jentoft, David Shipway, Andrea Sebastiano Ciccone, Paula Sobrini-Morillo, Cecilia Margareta Lund, Harmke A. Polinder‐Bos, Francesco Mattace‐Raso, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Jugdeep Dhesi, Nina Rosa Neuendorff, Nicolás M. González-Senac, Anja Velghe, Marije Hamaker, I.S. Moens, on behalf of the SIG Perioperative Geriatric Medicine and the SIG Gero-Oncology of the European Geriatric Medicine Society
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide an up-to-date overview of geriatricians' involvement in oncological and onco-surgical care for older adults across Europe. METHODS: An anonymous 35-item online survey was distributed via (inter)national societies between 10 April and 23 May 2025. The responses were summarized, and associations between comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) outputs, participation in oncological multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, and involvement in treatment decision-making were explored. RESULTS: A total of 2160 responses were received from 37 countries. Further analysis included 395 geriatrician/internal medicine respondents with > 25% survey completion from 34 countries. Of them, 19% reported no formal geriatric oncology model; the most common approaches were referral based on clinical judgment (43%) and a two-step pathway (42%). Frailty screening-guided referral occurred in 63%, with the G8 (50%) and Clinical Frailty Scale (32%) being the most commonly used. Among respondents, 30% reported routine MDT attendance, and 20% reported involvement in treatment decisions. In exploratory analyses, routine MDT participation was associated with active treatment decision-making (aOR 6.01, 95% CI 3.08-11.7), CGA-based recommendations addressing both geriatric domains and oncological treatment (aOR 5.81, 95% CI 3.16-10.7), and positive feedback from oncology/surgery teams (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.96-7.14; all p < 0.001). Only 39% of respondents were involved in inpatient surgical oncology care, with liaison models predominating (37%). CONCLUSION: Geriatric oncology and geriatric surgical oncology remain unevenly implemented across Europe. Standardized pathways, training, and MDT integration may improve equity of care for older adults with cancer.

European Geriatric Medicine
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), Inserm (FR), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Ghent University Hospital (BE), At Bristol (GB), Erasmus MC (NL), Gentofte Hospital (DK), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR), Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne (DE), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Diakonessenhuis hospital (NL), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Bristol Clinical Commissioning Group (GB), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES), Hôpital Pasteur (FR), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES)
European Geriatric Medicine Society
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.