Development of a multidimensional scale for discomfort related to personal protective equipment and its exploratory association with musculoskeletal symptoms among Korean healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic required healthcare workers (HCWs) to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for prolonged periods, raising concerns about its possible relationship with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). PPE-related discomfort, however, is multidimensional, encompassing both direct wearing burden and organisational aspects of its deployment. How these two dimensions relate to MSDs has rarely been examined. This cross-sectional study analysed 565 Korean physicians, nurses and medical technicians who had directly cared for patients with COVID-19. A 17-item PPE Discomfort Scale was developed and its factor structure was examined using exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation. As an exploratory objective, cross-sectional associations between PPE-related discomfort and MSDs were examined using hierarchical modified Poisson regression, adjusting sequentially for demographic, occupational, ergonomic and psychosocial covariates. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two factors; direct wearing burden (Factor 1) and organisational vulnerability (Factor 2). The prevalence of MSDs was 37.2%, with the lower back most frequently affected (19.5%). Greater total PPE discomfort was associated with MSDs (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.18–2.16 in the ergonomic-adjusted model). When the two subscales were entered simultaneously, the association was observed for organisational vulnerability (1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.93), but not for direct wearing burden (0.98, 95% CI 0.67–1.44). Sleep disturbance, traumatic experience, current smoking and ergonomic exposure were independently associated with MSDs. After further adjustment for current smoking, sleep disturbance and traumatic experience, these associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant (total score 1.28, 95% CI 0.95–1.74; organisational vulnerability 1.25, 95% CI 0.96–1.62), whereas ergonomic exposure remained associated with MSDs. The PPE Discomfort Scale identified two dimensions: direct wearing burden and organisational vulnerability, supporting a multidimensional conceptualisation of PPE-related discomfort. In exploratory analyses, organisational vulnerability showed a stronger association with MSDs, although this association was attenuated after additional adjustment. Further studies are needed to confirm the factor structure and evaluate the scale in other healthcare settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Published
2026-08-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-026-00527-3
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a multidimensional scale for discomfort related to personal protective equipment and its exploratory association with musculoskeletal symptoms among Korean healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mo‐Yeol Kang, Jun‐Pyo Myong, Seung Yeon Jeon, Jongin Lee
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Infection Control and Ventilation
article

Development of a multidimensional scale for discomfort related to personal protective equipment and its exploratory association with musculoskeletal symptoms among Korean healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mo‐Yeol Kang, Jun‐Pyo Myong, Seung Yeon Jeon, Jongin Lee
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required healthcare workers (HCWs) to use personal protective equipment (PPE) for prolonged periods, raising concerns about its possible relationship with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). PPE-related discomfort, however, is multidimensional, encompassing both direct wearing burden and organisational aspects of its deployment. How these two dimensions relate to MSDs has rarely been examined. This cross-sectional study analysed 565 Korean physicians, nurses and medical technicians who had directly cared for patients with COVID-19. A 17-item PPE Discomfort Scale was developed and its factor structure was examined using exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotation. As an exploratory objective, cross-sectional associations between PPE-related discomfort and MSDs were examined using hierarchical modified Poisson regression, adjusting sequentially for demographic, occupational, ergonomic and psychosocial covariates. Exploratory factor analysis yielded two factors; direct wearing burden (Factor 1) and organisational vulnerability (Factor 2). The prevalence of MSDs was 37.2%, with the lower back most frequently affected (19.5%). Greater total PPE discomfort was associated with MSDs (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.60, 95% CI 1.18–2.16 in the ergonomic-adjusted model). When the two subscales were entered simultaneously, the association was observed for organisational vulnerability (1.48, 95% CI 1.14–1.93), but not for direct wearing burden (0.98, 95% CI 0.67–1.44). Sleep disturbance, traumatic experience, current smoking and ergonomic exposure were independently associated with MSDs. After further adjustment for current smoking, sleep disturbance and traumatic experience, these associations were attenuated and no longer statistically significant (total score 1.28, 95% CI 0.95–1.74; organisational vulnerability 1.25, 95% CI 0.96–1.62), whereas ergonomic exposure remained associated with MSDs. The PPE Discomfort Scale identified two dimensions: direct wearing burden and organisational vulnerability, supporting a multidimensional conceptualisation of PPE-related discomfort. In exploratory analyses, organisational vulnerability showed a stronger association with MSDs, although this association was attenuated after additional adjustment. Further studies are needed to confirm the factor structure and evaluate the scale in other healthcare settings.

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
St. Mary's Hospital (US), St Mary's Hospital (GB), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
National Medical Center
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Infection Control and Ventilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.