Electrophysiological Correlates of Encoding Indicate Altered Processing but Comparable Subsequent Memory Effects Across Virtual Reality and Desktop‐Based Conditions

Successful episodic memory formation emerges from the interplay of perceptual, attentional, contextual, and elaborative processes. The relative contribution of these processes to encoding may vary with the conditions under which information is encountered. In particular, different presentation modalities, like virtual reality (VR) and desktop-based presentations (PC), can convey the same semantic identity of an item while differing in perceptual, spatial, and contextual information. Although VR- and PC-encoded memories have been observed to differ in retrieval processes, it remains unclear whether these differences arise during encoding. The present study addressed this question by comparing successful object encoding across presentation modes. Participants incidentally encoded everyday objects in VR and on a PC, and successful encoding was assessed by relating encoding-related EEG activity to later memory. Subsequently remembered objects elicited reliable ERP subsequent memory effects, linked to semantic, contextual, and elaborative encoding processes, as well as an enhanced theta-band response, indicating contextual integration. However, these effects were not modulated by presentation mode, consistent with comparable memory performance across conditions. In contrast, presentation mode affected encoding activity irrespective of subsequent memory success: VR elicited a more negative early ERP and stronger theta-band activity at frontal sensors than PC-based presentation, potentially reflecting altered object evaluation and enhanced visuospatial integration. These modality-dependent differences could not be attributed primarily to early visual or attentional processing, as they were not accompanied by differences in P1 or alpha-band responses. Thus, VR altered general object processing during encoding, whereas the neural processes predicting later recognition were comparable across presentation modes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.70664
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Electrophysiological Correlates of Encoding Indicate Altered Processing but Comparable Subsequent Memory Effects Across Virtual Reality and Desktop‐Based Conditions

Joanna Kisker, Merle Sagehorn, Thomas Gruber
European Journal of Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Electrophysiological Correlates of Encoding Indicate Altered Processing but Comparable Subsequent Memory Effects Across Virtual Reality and Desktop‐Based Conditions

Joanna Kisker, Merle Sagehorn, Thomas Gruber
article en

Abstract

Successful episodic memory formation emerges from the interplay of perceptual, attentional, contextual, and elaborative processes. The relative contribution of these processes to encoding may vary with the conditions under which information is encountered. In particular, different presentation modalities, like virtual reality (VR) and desktop-based presentations (PC), can convey the same semantic identity of an item while differing in perceptual, spatial, and contextual information. Although VR- and PC-encoded memories have been observed to differ in retrieval processes, it remains unclear whether these differences arise during encoding. The present study addressed this question by comparing successful object encoding across presentation modes. Participants incidentally encoded everyday objects in VR and on a PC, and successful encoding was assessed by relating encoding-related EEG activity to later memory. Subsequently remembered objects elicited reliable ERP subsequent memory effects, linked to semantic, contextual, and elaborative encoding processes, as well as an enhanced theta-band response, indicating contextual integration. However, these effects were not modulated by presentation mode, consistent with comparable memory performance across conditions. In contrast, presentation mode affected encoding activity irrespective of subsequent memory success: VR elicited a more negative early ERP and stronger theta-band activity at frontal sensors than PC-based presentation, potentially reflecting altered object evaluation and enhanced visuospatial integration. These modality-dependent differences could not be attributed primarily to early visual or attentional processing, as they were not accompanied by differences in P1 or alpha-band responses. Thus, VR altered general object processing during encoding, whereas the neural processes predicting later recognition were comparable across presentation modes.

European Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 64(5)
Osnabrück University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.